We previously reported speaking-related activity changes associated with assisted recovery induced by a fluency shaping therapy program and unassisted recovery from developmental stuttering (Kell et al., Brain 2009). While assisted recovery re-lateralized activity to the left hemisphere, unassisted recovery was specifically associated with the activation of the left BA 47/12 in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggested plastic changes in speakingrelated functional connectivity between left hemispheric speech network nodes. We reanalyzed these data involving 13 stuttering men before and after fluency shaping, 13 men who recovered spontaneously from their stuttering, and 13 male control participants, and examined functional connectivity during overt vs. covert reading by means of psychophysiological interactions computed across left cortical regions involved in articulation control. Persistent stuttering was associated with reduced auditory-motor coupling and enhanced integration of somatosensory feedback between the supramarginal gyrus and the prefrontal cortex. Assisted recovery reduced this hyper-connectivity and increased functional connectivity between the articulatory motor cortex and the auditory feedback processing anterior superior temporal gyrus. In spontaneous recovery, both auditory-motor coupling and integration of somatosensory feedback were normalized. In addition, activity in the left orbitofrontal cortex and superior cerebellum appeared uncoupled from the rest of the speech production network. These data suggest that therapy and spontaneous recovery normalizes the left hemispheric speaking-related activity via an improvement of auditory-motor mapping. By contrast, long-lasting unassisted recovery from stuttering is additionally supported by a functional isolation of the superior cerebellum from the rest of the speech production network, through the pivotal left BA 47/12.
KeywordsPsychophysiological interactions; speech production; overt reading; auditorymotor interactions, left inferior frontal gyrus
Corresponding AuthorChristian Kell To view all the submission files, including those not included in the PDF, click on the manuscript title on your EVISE Homepage, then click 'Download zip file'. We dealt with all their remarks, hopefully convincingly, and we hope that this version is now acceptable for publication.
Order of Authors
GOETHE UNIVERSITY FRANKFURT MEDICAL FACULTYYours faithfully,
Christian Kell
Response to ReviewersWe thank both reviewers for their careful evaluation of the manuscript. We have reanalyzed the data, updated all results, and re-written parts of the Introduction and Discussion based on their suggestions. Please find our answers below.
Reviewer #1 INTRODUCTIONComment: The authors claim that "relapses are frequent" and "rarely adults who stutter recover spontaneously", "fluency induction due to scanner noise", and statements about subjects not entering a consistent "default mode". Can they provide citations for each of these statements? I have heard t...