2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11093796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathomics and Deep Learning Classification of a Heterogeneous Fluorescence Histology Image Dataset

Abstract: Automated pathology image classification through modern machine learning (ML) techniques in quantitative microscopy is an emerging AI application area aiming to alleviate the increased workload of pathologists and improve diagnostic accuracy and consistency. However, there are very few efforts focusing on fluorescence histology image data, which is a challenging task, not least due to the variable imaging acquisition parameters in pooled data, which can diminish the performance of ML-based decision support too… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gou et al (Gou et al, 2019) developed an image processing method that uses a two-step strategy for each fluorescent image to exclude auto-fluorescence or dust. Ioannidis et al (Ioannidis et al, 2021) reported a normalized preprocessing protocol for processing heterogeneous fluorescence images in terms of image magnification. Zhang et al (Zhang and Zhao 2019) applied preprocessing methods such as size adjustment and data expansion to each fluorescence dataset and then used CapsNet to classify the subcellular localization of proteins with an accuracy of 93.08%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gou et al (Gou et al, 2019) developed an image processing method that uses a two-step strategy for each fluorescent image to exclude auto-fluorescence or dust. Ioannidis et al (Ioannidis et al, 2021) reported a normalized preprocessing protocol for processing heterogeneous fluorescence images in terms of image magnification. Zhang et al (Zhang and Zhao 2019) applied preprocessing methods such as size adjustment and data expansion to each fluorescence dataset and then used CapsNet to classify the subcellular localization of proteins with an accuracy of 93.08%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the “off-the-shelf” TL was used in the proposed methodology because of the low number of available samples in the examined patient cohort and the unbalanced natural prevalence of the disease. Additionally, this methodology has been successfully integrated into many medical image classification tasks, such as interstitial lung disease [ 37 ], colonic polyps [ 38 ], breast cancer [ 39 ], breast density assessment [ 40 ] and brain neoplasms [ 41 ], and evaluated across multiple other histopathology datasets [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Seven Cell Line Dataset, the measured values of F1 are 0.865; for the LNCaP Dataset, the measured values of F1 are 0.874. PPU-Net similarly Limitations: To determine the optimal approach in cell microscopy, specialized object delineation methods and unique data sets outside the purview of the work are required Year: 2021 Ioannidis et al ( 2021 ) proposed a Pathomics and Deep Learning methodology for Fluorescence Histology Images Features: Backbone: Not mentioned Loss: Not mentioned The proposed module calculated the area of each object using the label function from Mahot's library, and it used all of the Pyradiomics library's accessible features, including statistical and higher-order statistical texture features. In addition, on the training set, three labeled nuclei types were achieved using the PyMRR library and the Mutual Information Differences (MID) technique to recognize an eloquent feature group Comparison: Xception, Residual Network (ResNet), Visual Geometry Group (VGG), Mobile-Net, Dense-Net and Nas-Net Datasets: Cell images of one distinct organ (Breast) were taken from Fluorescence Dataset (Kromp et al 2020 ) Parameters: Area Under Curve (AUC) and Accuracy (ACC) Inference: The proposed model was better in terms of performance as compared to other models in spite of the heterogeneity owing to the nonexistence of standardized image acquisition protocol, thus proving it to be applicable as a generalized and robust model in different scenario.…”
Section: Survey On Deep Learning Based Nucleus Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%