2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41385-018-0036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathophysiology of environmental enteric dysfunction and its impact on oral vaccine efficacy

Abstract: Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) refers to a subclinical disorder of intestinal function common in tropical countries and in settings of poverty and economic disadvantage. The enteropathy that underlies this syndrome is characterized by mucosal inflammation and villus blunting mediated by T cell activation. Epithelial cell disruption and microbial translocation drive systemic inflammation. EED in young children is associated geographically with growth failure, malnutrition, and greatly impaired response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The working hypothesis is that an environmental driver, including recurrent or persistent enteric infection, infections from specific pathogen(s), an abundance of nonpathogenic fecal microbes, or distortion of intestinal microbiota composition, could precipitate and/or perpetuate the small bowel response. This process is analogous to the small bowel response to gluten in gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE), also known as celiac disease [9,11,23]. After a flurry of biopsy studies four decades ago [24][25][26][27][28], there has been a paucity of histologic studies of the small bowel until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working hypothesis is that an environmental driver, including recurrent or persistent enteric infection, infections from specific pathogen(s), an abundance of nonpathogenic fecal microbes, or distortion of intestinal microbiota composition, could precipitate and/or perpetuate the small bowel response. This process is analogous to the small bowel response to gluten in gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE), also known as celiac disease [9,11,23]. After a flurry of biopsy studies four decades ago [24][25][26][27][28], there has been a paucity of histologic studies of the small bowel until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies provide an opportunity to compare immune cell function between children at admission, when infections are present, and during recovery when children are still wasted but infections have been treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, characterizing immunological recovery is challenging since “healthy” immune function is poorly defined and sub-clinical pathogen carriage (4749) and enteropathy (50) are common even among adequately-nourished children in LMIC. Some studies have enrolled adequately-nourished children from high-income countries (HIC) as controls, but their utility in determining immunological thresholds for children in LMIC is limited by their vastly different developmental and environmental exposure histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical damage to the epithelial barrier ranges from localized abrasions and loss of tight junction proteins between epithelial cells to widespread reductions in epithelial surface area due to villous atrophy (69). There is an associated increase in leukocyte infiltration into the lamina propria (50, 69), which may be driven by a number of signals, including damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and chemoattractants released by activated epithelial cells and tissue-resident immune cells. One consequence of these epithelial changes is increased gut permeability (12, 69, 70), which can be measured indirectly by increased urinary excretion of compounds that are usually not absorbed (e.g., lactulose) and/or increased blood levels of bacterial antigens that would usually be retained on the apical side of the epithelium in the gut lumen (microbial translocation) (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to MT, some important biomarkers of MT are now being used to detect EED. These include bacterial cell wall lipopolysaccharide (LPS), soluble lipopolysaccharide co-receptor (sCD14) and antibodies to the LPS core antigen (EndoCAb) [71]. The clinical impact of EE, apart from stunting, is decreased immunological response to oral vaccines.…”
Section: Environmental Enteric Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%