Purpose
Our objective was to characterize long-term M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) results after primary intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) among patients with “low-intermediate risk” OPC who would be eligible for current trials (e.g. ECOG 3311, NRG HN002, CRUK PATHOS).
Methods
A retrospective pooled analysis combined data from three single-institution clinical trials for advanced stage head and neck carcinoma. Inclusion criteria were clinical stage III/IV OPC (T1-2/N1-2b, T3/N0-2b) treated with definitive split-field IMRT and prospectively-collected MDADI at baseline and at least one post-treatment interval available in trial databases. Patients were sampled to represent likely HPV-associated disease (HPV+/p16+ or <10 pack-years if HPV/p16 unknown). MDADI composite scores were collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Pairwise tests were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.
Results
Forty-six patients were included. All received bilateral neck irradiation with a median dose of 70Gy and systemic therapy (57% concurrent, 43% induction only). Overall, the mean baseline MDADI composite score was 90.1, dropping to 74.6 at 6 months (p<0.0001) and rising to 78.5 (p<0.0001) and 83.1 (p=0.002) by 12 and 24 months relative to baseline, respectively, representing a clinically meaningful drop in MDADI scores at 6-months that partially recovers by 24 months (6 v 24-months, p=0.05). Poor MDADI scores (composite<60) were reported in 4, 11, 15 and 9% of patients at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 24-months, respectively. 15% of patients had a persistently depressed composite score by at least 20 points at the 24-month interval.
Conclusion
“Low-intermediate risk” patients with OPC treated with laryngeal/esophageal inlet dose-optimized split-field IMRT are highly likely to report recovery of acceptable swallowing function in long-term follow-up. Only 15% report poor swallowing function and/or persistently depressed MDADI at 12 months or more after IMRT. These data serve as a benchmark future trial design and endpoint interpretation.