1995
DOI: 10.1080/03612759.1995.9949174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paths Not Taken: British Labour and International Policy in the 1920s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supposedly, the party “regarded conflict as unreal, illusory and mistaken” and “clung to the belief that force was always suspect no matter what the purpose behind its use” (Gordon, 1969:43). Accounts of Labour's international policy that might be considered better researched have questioned this interpretation (Naylor, 1969; Winkler, 1994). Yet contemporary analyses continue to stress that Labour's internationalism was somehow unreal and that it underestimated the role of power in international politics.…”
Section: Conventional Historiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supposedly, the party “regarded conflict as unreal, illusory and mistaken” and “clung to the belief that force was always suspect no matter what the purpose behind its use” (Gordon, 1969:43). Accounts of Labour's international policy that might be considered better researched have questioned this interpretation (Naylor, 1969; Winkler, 1994). Yet contemporary analyses continue to stress that Labour's internationalism was somehow unreal and that it underestimated the role of power in international politics.…”
Section: Conventional Historiographymentioning
confidence: 99%