2009
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathway-Specific Variations in Neurovascular and Neurometabolic Coupling in Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex

Abstract: Functional neuroimaging signals are generated, in part, by increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) evoked by mediators, such as nitric oxide and arachidonic acid derivatives that are released in response to increased neurotransmission. However, it is unknown whether the vascular and metabolic responses within a given brain area differ when local neuronal activity is evoked by an activity in the distinct neuronal networks. In this study we assessed, for the first time, the differences in neuronal responses and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another contributing factor could be that PV neurons receive depressing glutamatergic input from the thalamus (Tan et al, 2008). Hence, our findings, together with recent studies on different subcortical or corticocortical afferent pathways and ensuing hypermic responses (Kocharyan et al, 2008;Enager et al, 2009), emphasize that the activated cortical circuitry is both afferent and stimulus specific, as distinct subsets of cortical neurons were recruited depending on the input.…”
Section: Identity Of the Cortical Neuronal Circuitry Recruited By Whimentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another contributing factor could be that PV neurons receive depressing glutamatergic input from the thalamus (Tan et al, 2008). Hence, our findings, together with recent studies on different subcortical or corticocortical afferent pathways and ensuing hypermic responses (Kocharyan et al, 2008;Enager et al, 2009), emphasize that the activated cortical circuitry is both afferent and stimulus specific, as distinct subsets of cortical neurons were recruited depending on the input.…”
Section: Identity Of the Cortical Neuronal Circuitry Recruited By Whimentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, understanding the cellular basis of the activated neurocircuitry is essential for adequate interpretation of brain imaging data. A growing body of evidence suggests that both excitatory and inhibitory neurons govern the hemodynamic response to increased neuronal activity (Niessing et al, 2005;Kocharyan et al, 2008;Enager et al, 2009). However, the identity of the neurons recruited by a given afferent input, their interaction with astrocytes, and the mechanisms by which their activation results in changes in CBF remain largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, several studies indicate that GABAergic interneurons, including PV þ interneurons participate in regulating hemodynamic responses. [129][130][131] Moreover, the oxygen overshoot during the activity-dependent hemodynamic response might serve the upkeep of sufficient oxygen levels in mitochondria of fast-spiking interneurons, particularly when located in some distance from the vasculature. 132,133 Why would fast-spiking interneurons need higher amounts of energy than more scarcely spiking principal cells or other types of interneurons?…”
Section: Interneuron Energy Hypothesis O Kann Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α=.29 [22] and β=1.5 [20] were used. We used CMRO 20 =256.9±11.5 μmol/100 g/ min [23] and CBF 0 =0.4, 0.69 and 0.91 ml/g per minute (Table 1). M reflects the baseline deoxyHb content and is also defined as the maximum BOLD change for the baseline state in the region of interest.…”
Section: Modeling Bold Responses From Cbf and Cmro 2 Data In The Barrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBF and CMRO 2 changes as a function of stimulus frequency measured in the rat barrel cortex following trigeminal nerve stimulation as described in [23] were used to model BOLD responses.…”
Section: Modeling Bold Responses From Cbf and Cmro 2 Data In The Barrmentioning
confidence: 99%