2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690903117921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathway Towards Fluency: Using ‘disaggregate instruction’ to promote science literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
31
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…These types of informal education opportunities outside the K-12 classroom, with audiences that can include adults, are less frequent, likely because scientists are unaware of the existence of such opportunities (1). Additionally, because of their informality, science centers provide an excellent opportunity for researchers to discuss their work in everyday, nontechnical language, which has been shown to improve the understanding of science concepts (7,8). To date, most studies have examined the motivation of and challenges facing scientists participating in such outreach (1,10,13,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These types of informal education opportunities outside the K-12 classroom, with audiences that can include adults, are less frequent, likely because scientists are unaware of the existence of such opportunities (1). Additionally, because of their informality, science centers provide an excellent opportunity for researchers to discuss their work in everyday, nontechnical language, which has been shown to improve the understanding of science concepts (7,8). To date, most studies have examined the motivation of and challenges facing scientists participating in such outreach (1,10,13,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bruner (1966Bruner ( , 1986, Lemke (1990), Taber (2000), Driver et al (2000), Newton (2002), Mercer et al (2004) and, more recently, Brown and his coauthors (Brown and Ryoo 2008;Brown et al 2010;Brown and Spang 2008), for example, concentrate on how thinking may be scaffolded (to use Bruner's term for the sociocultural learning process exemplified by Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD); see Foley 1994;Mooney 2000). From an ethnographic perspective, Brown and colleagues' work has emphasised the linguistic dimensions of scaffolding.…”
Section: Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a study of the sociolinguistic discourse of a science teacher, Brown and his co-researchers concluded that, Bby including vernacular alternatives to science terms, students were given a vision of science that was connected to their collective experience^ (Brown and Spang 2008, p. 731). They believe that Bthe acquisition of the academic language of science remains one of the most difficult aspects of students' science learning^ (Brown et al 2010(Brown et al , p. 1490). Lemke's (1990) firm recommendation was that Teachers should express all semantic relations among terms, and all conceptual relationships for each topic, in ordinary colloquial language as well as in scientific language, insofar as possible, and clearly signal when they are using each.…”
Section: Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is in this sense that AL words become, as argued by Nagy and Townsend, tools for communication and comprehension. This focus on high-utility AL is not in opposition to the teaching discipline-specific AL, where the emphasis is on increasing adolescents' facility with the language that is unique to math, science, or history; rather it is complementary (August et al, 2009;Brown, Ryoo, & Rodriguez, 2010;). …”
Section: Whatmentioning
confidence: 99%