2019
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathways for Remembering and Recognizing Indigenous Thought in Education: Philosophies of Iethi'nihsténha Ohwentsia'kékha (Land) by Sandra D. Styres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge the work that Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have done to create the pathway to envisioning ways of horizontal and reciprocal relationships when working with Indigenous communities. It is our goal that Chikomexochitl aligns with the emerging body of Indigenous methodologies, which have at the core components such as relationality-knowledge can emerge through the relationships that inform it, reciprocity-it is important that the research addresses Indigenous peoples' needs, accountability-the researcher needs to be accountable to the relationships that are formed through the study, ways of knowing directly connected to the land, and orality (Archibald, 2008;Chilisa, 2012;Kovach, 2009Kovach, , 2010Smith, 2012;Styres, 2017;Tuck & McKenzie, 2015;Wilson, 2008).…”
Section: Meaningful Relationships Of Collaboration In Research: Towar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We acknowledge the work that Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have done to create the pathway to envisioning ways of horizontal and reciprocal relationships when working with Indigenous communities. It is our goal that Chikomexochitl aligns with the emerging body of Indigenous methodologies, which have at the core components such as relationality-knowledge can emerge through the relationships that inform it, reciprocity-it is important that the research addresses Indigenous peoples' needs, accountability-the researcher needs to be accountable to the relationships that are formed through the study, ways of knowing directly connected to the land, and orality (Archibald, 2008;Chilisa, 2012;Kovach, 2009Kovach, , 2010Smith, 2012;Styres, 2017;Tuck & McKenzie, 2015;Wilson, 2008).…”
Section: Meaningful Relationships Of Collaboration In Research: Towar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I, Hector, a person with Totonac and Spanish ancestries, and a person of colour, am a non-Masewal person trained in the classical music tradition. According to Styres (2017), "the only place from which any of us can write or speak with some degree of certainty is from the position of who we are in relation to what we know" (p. 7). I frequently revisit Styre's statement to reflect and frame my ongoing decolonizing process as a researcher trained both in the Global South and Global North.…”
Section: Xinachtlakualtilistli: the Planning Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Stó:lō and many other Indigenous peoples, all matter and sounds-including those sounds understood as music-are imbued with spirit and therefore are alive and have agency (Archibald, 2008;Atleo, 2004;Borrows, 2010;Ignace & Ignace, 2017;Styres, 2017). According to Robinson (2020), Western art musicians generally conceive listening to music as a one-sided activity done by a listener, whereas many Indigenous peoples conceptualize the act of listening as attending "to the relationship between listener and the listened to .…”
Section: Resonant Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The word Land is capitalized to call attention to and affirm its sentient nature. Furthermore, according to many Indigenous peoples, it is a philosophical concept that expresses relationality (Styres, 2017). 6.…”
Section: Update 41(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-creative experience made clear that 'placemaking' is inadequate as a descriptive term: in a statement that resonated deeply with participants, Lucy Tukua observed, 'As Indigenous peoples, we don't make place -Place makes us' (ELMNT FM, 2019). 'Place Makes Us' hinges on a more-than-ontological distinction between Indigenous understandings of the Earth as a sacred, animate and sentient being, and Western conceptualizations of abstract space, geographical place, surface landscape and material land -a distinction that we signify in English using uppercase-L Land and uppercase-P Place (Lambert, 2014;Lister et al, 2022;McGregor, 2018;Styres, 2017;Watts, 2013). Even where the affective, particular and storied, experiential, or agentic qualities of lowercase-l land and lowercase-p place are recognized within Western paradigms, the abundance, spirit, animacy, kinship and intentionality of Land/Place tend not to be (Chung-Tiam-Fook, 2020;Styres, 2017;Watts, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%