Pathways to food insecurity: Migration, hukou and COVID‐19 in Nanjing, China

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic has issued significant challenges to food systems and the food security of migrants in cities. In China, there have been no studies to date focusing on the food security of migrants during the pandemic. To fill this gap, an online questionnaire survey of food security in Nanjing City, China, was conducted in March 2020. This paper situates the research findings in the general literature on the general migrant experience during the pandemic under COVID and the specifics of the Chinese policy of hukou. Using multiple linear regression and ordered logistic regression, the paper examines the impact of migration status on food security during the pandemic. The paper finds that during the COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020, households without local Nanjing hukou were more food insecure than those with Nanjing hukou. The differences related more to the absolute quantity of food intake, rather than reduction in food quality or in levels of anxiety over food access. Migrants in China and elsewhere during COVID‐19 experienced three pathways to food insecurity—an income gap, an accessibility gap, and a benefits gap. This conceptual framework is used to structure the discussion and interpretation of survey findings and also has wider potential applicability.

The influence of the Chinese hukou system in motivating and shaping the geography of Chinese international student mobility

“…In other words, nearly half of the population was more or less affected by nonlocal hukou status in China, which makes the hukou system an important perspective when examining both Chinese internal and international migration. The diverse negative effects of the hukou system on internal migrants include the fields of employment (Song, 2014; Wang & Moffatt, 2008; Xiao & Bian, 2018; Zhang, 2020), marriage (Lui, 2017; Qian & Qian, 2017) and even food security during the Covid pandemic (Xu et al, 2023). In contrast to the widespread recognition of hukou's significant influence on Chinese internal migration, the effect of this system on international migration is still underexplored.…”

The determinants of mental health inequalities between Chinese migrants and non-migrants during the Shanghai 2022 lockdown: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition

“…Chinese citizens who are living in another city other than the city where they have household registration ( hukou in Chinese, managed at the municipal level) are classified as internal migrants [ 5 ]. Since the hukou affiliation is linked with the provision of public social services (e.g., housing, education, job benefits, health insurance, employment) [ 6 ], and marginalization, isolation, and discrimination [ 7 ], internal migrants without a hukou (temporary migrants) are more vulnerable to mental health problems than migrants with a hukou (permanent migrants) [ 8 ]. Individuals with higher socioeconomic status (SES), including higher education and income, are likely to acquire a hukou in their migration destination, but they may face additional stressors such as purchasing property [ 9 ].…”