“…While in the classical setup no-arbitrage theory, including dynamic understanding of the superhedging price, is well developed in continuous time, see Föllmer and Kramkov [1997], Delbaen and Schachermayer [2006], in the robust setting an extension of abstract no-arbitrage theory, as developed in Bouchard and Nutz [2015] or Burzoni et al, to the continuous time is still open. This is despite a body of works which have achieved either particular or generic steps towards such a goal, large enough so that we can not do it justice in this introduction but refer to Avellaneda et al [1996], Lyons [1995], Denis and Martini [2006], Cox and Obłój [2011], Denis and Kervarec [2013], Epstein and Ji [2014], Biagini et al [2017], Hou and Obłój [2018], Beiglböck et al [2017], Bartl et al [2017] and the references therein. We note that d may be large and our assets may include both primary and derivate assets.…”