2014
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient anatomy predicts operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery

Abstract: Anatomical measurements made on preoperative computed tomography in patients undergoing robotic TECAB can predict time requirements for various procedural steps. A shorter distance between the chest wall and the heart predicts longer anastomotic and total operative times. This information could assist the TECAB surgeon with surgical planning and help guide the TECAB trainee in patient selection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to their results, the mean robotic operative time in our study was similar regardless of BMI (morbid obesity vs others; TECAB = 271 min vs 289 min, MVS = 312 min vs 331 min). Wehman et al 22 analyzed the computed tomography findings of patients undergoing TECAB and concluded that some of the anatomical findings (distance from the heart to the chest wall, pericardial fat, subcutaneous tissue) negatively affect the operative time, but not BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to their results, the mean robotic operative time in our study was similar regardless of BMI (morbid obesity vs others; TECAB = 271 min vs 289 min, MVS = 312 min vs 331 min). Wehman et al 22 analyzed the computed tomography findings of patients undergoing TECAB and concluded that some of the anatomical findings (distance from the heart to the chest wall, pericardial fat, subcutaneous tissue) negatively affect the operative time, but not BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a 35 mm ascending aortic diameter as the upper limit for size. Other anatomical features such as the thickness of the pericardial fat pad and subcutaneous tissue at the nipple line have been shown to impact the duration of robotic left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvesting, whereas LIMA-left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomotic and overall operative times have been shown to be longer when the heart is closer to the chest wall in beating heart TECAB but not in arrested TECAB (8). These specifics, along with the availability of the endostabilizer, may guide the surgeon's decision making on whether to arrest or perform beating heart TECAB.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were interesting publications on the application of medical image measurement techniques for establishing the anatomical features that may affect the duration [18] or chance of success of robotic surgical procedures [19]. …”
Section: Analysis Of Scientific Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%