Patient and Clinician Openness to Including a Broader Range of Healing Options in Primary Care

Abstract

PURPOSE We studied the openness of patients and clinicians to introducing a broader range of healing options into primary care.METHODS Focus groups were conducted with primary care patients (4 groups) and clinicians (3 groups) from an integrated medical care system in 2008. Transcripts of discussions were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach. RESULTSBoth patients (n = 44) and clinicians (n = 32) were open to including a wider variety of healing options in primary care. Patients desired some evidence of effectiveness, although there was wide variation in the type of evidence required. Many patients believed that the clinician's personal and practice experience was an important form of evidence. Patients wanted to share in the decision to refer and the choice of options. Clinicians were most concerned with safety of specifi c treatments, including some of the herbs and dietary supplements. They also believed they lacked adequate information about the nature, benefi ts, and risks of many alternatives, and they were not aware of local practitioners and resources to whom they could confi dently refer their patients. Both patients and clinicians were concerned that services recommended be covered by insurance or be affordable to patients. CONCLUSIONSIntegrating additional healing options into primary care may be feasible and desirable, as well as help meet the needs of patients with conditions that have not been responsive to standard medical treatments.

Perspectives of older adults on co-management of low back pain by doctors of chiropractic and family medicine physicians: a focus group study

“…Barriers to LBP co-management identified by these participants included financial costs, scheduling and transportation issues, and side effects from medication or chiropractic treatment, similar to other studies [42,43,61]. Participants thought some providers would be unwilling to engage in collaborative practice, a finding noted in other studies that have explored combining conventional and complementary approaches to healthcare [42,51].…”

Complementary Medicine for Cancer Patients in General Practice: Qualitative Interviews with German General Practitioners

“…Studies report that patients expect their physician to be open-minded and non-judgmental with respect to CAM, and to reinforce a sense of hope, but do not expect him or her to have extensive knowledge in it [15,28]. In contrast, GPs feel responsible for considering the efficacy and safety of both conventional medicine and CAM remedies [20].…”

“…They admit lacking knowledge required to make appropriate recommendations on matters pertaining to CAM and express the need for more information on the subject [15,16]. However, at the same time, they seem to be one of the main sources of information on CAM for cancer patients [17].…”

Efficacy of yoga for depressed postpartum women: A randomized controlled trial

“…Additionally, individuals who are already practicing self-care strategies (e.g., regular exercise, consume healthy foods) are attracted to the holistic nature and focus of deriving benefit from the body's natural ability to heal that is fundamental to CAM practices (Schuster, Dobson, Jauregui, & Blanks, 2004;Hsu, Cherkin, Hoffmeyer, Sherman, & Phillips, 2011).…”