1993
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/10.4.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient and General Practitioner Perceptions of Patient-held Health Records

Abstract: The objective of this study was to describe the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and their patients to patient-held health records (PHR). The study was set in a general practice in South Australia. It consisted of a descriptive study using a mail questionnaire. A stratified random sample, based on socioeconomic indicators for areas in South Australia, of GPs (n = 315) and their patients (n = 500) was used. The indices for contents, problems and benefits of the PHR showed adequate internal consistency a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parents/patients tended to view them as a personal document for their own reference, whereas physicians tended to view records as a communication and management tool. 62 In any case, it is probably safe to view parent-held records as we would any other form of written information and assume that it is best to highlight critical points via individualized verbal instruction and supportive counseling.…”
Section: Parent-held Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents/patients tended to view them as a personal document for their own reference, whereas physicians tended to view records as a communication and management tool. 62 In any case, it is probably safe to view parent-held records as we would any other form of written information and assume that it is best to highlight critical points via individualized verbal instruction and supportive counseling.…”
Section: Parent-held Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite little involvement, most professionals thought a patient held record would be of benefit to patients. The fear that it would increase paperwork echoes the findings of Teng Liaw 15 but there was little anxiety that consultation times would be aVected. It is likely, but not proven, that better education of both patients and professionals of the potential value of the patient held record might extend and enhance its use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is noteworthy that the staff awareness was similar to that of South Australian general practitioners in a 1993 study. 19 While it might appear that awareness has not improved since 1993, local factors (eg, impending health smart card introduction) may affect this awareness considerably. The relatively poor patient awareness is concerning, especially with the recent media discussions related to the Access card.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%