2024
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC): analysis of open-ended responses from patients and healthcare professionals

Rakhshan Kamran,
Liam Jackman,
Anna Laws
et al.

Abstract: ImportanceSeveral international calls have been made for evidence-based patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation for gender-affirming care. The Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC) is a resource which can help guide PROM implementation efforts, developed using a three-phase participatory research approach with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients and gender-affirming healthcare professionals. However, thoughts and perspectives from TGD patients and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this limitation, our team is conducting a qualitative study of TGD patients and healthcare professionals on their feedback for the PG-PROM-GAC. 29 Finally, there is a need to actually implement, use, and evaluate the PG-PROM-GAC. The strength of our study from an implementation science perspective is that we have done an a priori analysis of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, our team is conducting a qualitative study of TGD patients and healthcare professionals on their feedback for the PG-PROM-GAC. 29 Finally, there is a need to actually implement, use, and evaluate the PG-PROM-GAC. The strength of our study from an implementation science perspective is that we have done an a priori analysis of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%