Patient and Practice Perspectives on Strategies for Controlling Blood Pressure, North Carolina, 2010–2012

Abstract

IntroductionPatient and practice perspectives can inform development of team-based approaches to improving blood pressure control in primary care. We used a community-based participatory research approach to assess patient and practice perceptions regarding the value of team-based strategies for controlling blood pressure in a rural North Carolina population from 2010 through 2012.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 41 adults with hypertension, purposely sampled to include diversity of sex, race, literacy, and blood pressure control, and with key office staff at 5 rural primary care practices in the southeastern US “stroke belt.” Interviews explored barriers to controlling blood pressure, the practice’s role in controlling blood pressure, and opinions on the use of team care delivery.ResultsPatients reported that provider strategies to optimize blood pressure control should include regular visits, medication adjustment, side-effect discussion, and behavioral counseling. When discussing team-based approaches to hypertension care, patients valued verbal encouragement, calls from the doctor’s office, and the opportunity to ask questions. However, they voiced concerns about the effect of having too many people involved in their care. Practice staff focused on multiple, broad methods to control blood pressure including counseling, regular office visits, media to improve awareness, and support groups. An explicit focus of delivering care as teams was a newer concept.ConclusionWhen developing a team approach to hypertension treatment, patients value high-quality communication and not losing their primary relationship with their provider. Practice staff members were open to a team-based approach but had limited knowledge of what such an approach would entail.

The association of health literacy and blood pressure reduction in a cohort of patients with hypertension: The heart healthy lenoir trial

“…Focus groups and other stakeholder engagement activities were held in the formative year to adapt and design our intervention [18, 19]. Stakeholders included people representing patients, clinicians, local government, educational systems, faith communities, health advocacy groups and many others.…”

A multicomponent quality improvement intervention to improve blood pressure and reduce racial disparities in rural primary care practices

“…We used a nonrandomized observational trial design to maximize feasibility and acceptability for conducting this research in busy rural primary care practices unaccustomed to participating in research and to facilitate broad community participation . Detailed information on the study design and methods has been previously published in a study protocol paper . Briefly, the study included a formative phase, where we collected data from 41 in‐depth interviews with patients, providers, and staff (68.5% were AA, 7.3% were American Indian, and 7.3% were mixed race) to assess their perceptions of resources and barriers that influence HTN control in their region .…”

“…Detailed information on the study design and methods has been previously published in a study protocol paper . Briefly, the study included a formative phase, where we collected data from 41 in‐depth interviews with patients, providers, and staff (68.5% were AA, 7.3% were American Indian, and 7.3% were mixed race) to assess their perceptions of resources and barriers that influence HTN control in their region . During the implementation phase of this study, we conducted a practice‐based intervention using a QI approach, with strategies designed to change practice and patient behavior (outlined in Table ).…”

Applicability of Precision Medicine Approaches to Managing Hypertension in Rural Populations

“…Baseline and follow-up data were collected as described [29,30,[32][33][34]. BP was measured by trained research staff using the Omron HEM-907 automated BP monitor (Omron Healthcare, Inc., Vernon Hills, IL).…”