2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient and provider perspectives on Bedsider.org, an online contraceptive information tool, in a low income, racially diverse clinic population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluations of three other computer‐ or Web‐based tools have assessed associations with increased choice or use of the most effective methods, and results differed from ours. Two of those tools (Best Method for Me and Bedsider) were found to have positive associations; the third (the app developed by Gilliam and colleagues) was not associated with method choice, but was associated with women's likelihood of saying they were interested in discussing the implant . The fact that Smart Choices did not show similar associations may have to do with differences in the design of the tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Evaluations of three other computer‐ or Web‐based tools have assessed associations with increased choice or use of the most effective methods, and results differed from ours. Two of those tools (Best Method for Me and Bedsider) were found to have positive associations; the third (the app developed by Gilliam and colleagues) was not associated with method choice, but was associated with women's likelihood of saying they were interested in discussing the implant . The fact that Smart Choices did not show similar associations may have to do with differences in the design of the tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two of those tools (Best Method for Me and Bedsider) were found to have positive associations; [18][19][20] the third (the app developed by Gilliam and colleagues) was not associated with method choice, but was associated with women' s likelihood of saying they were interested in discussing the implant. 24 The fact that Smart Choices did not show similar associations may have to do with differences in the design of the tools. As noted earlier, the other three tools explicitly encourage use of the most effective methods (some more strongly than others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, this and other tools are not specific to the postpartum period and have limitations in generalizability. 60 ACOG has a patient education pamphlet on immediate postpartum use of LARC methods. 61 Additional shared decisionmaking tools are being developed that will increase future educational options for women and obstetric care providers, including integration of chronic health conditions into the recommendations.…”
Section: Patient Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%