2008
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-3-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient and surgery related factors associated with fatigue type polyethylene wear on 49 PCA and DURACON retrievals at autopsy and revision

Abstract: BackgroundPolyethylene wear is an important factor for longevity of total knee arthroplasty. Proven and suspicious factors causing wear can be grouped as material, patient and surgery related. There are more studies correlating design and/or biomaterial factors to in vivo wear than those to patient and surgery related factors. Many retrieval studies just include revision implants and therefore may not be representative. This study is aimed to correlate patient- and surgery- related factors to visual wear score… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation cannot be avoided due to the difficulty in obtaining implants at the time of autopsy. A study that compared 24 implants removed at autopsy to 25 implants retrieved at reoperation using a similar damage-grading methodology did find lower wear scores in the autopsy group [14]. Therefore, the implants from our study are likely a worst-case example of wear damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This limitation cannot be avoided due to the difficulty in obtaining implants at the time of autopsy. A study that compared 24 implants removed at autopsy to 25 implants retrieved at reoperation using a similar damage-grading methodology did find lower wear scores in the autopsy group [14]. Therefore, the implants from our study are likely a worst-case example of wear damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Assessments were made for each of seven wear damage modes: burnishing, scratching, pitting, delamination, surface deformation, abrasion, and third-body embedded debris. A scale of 0 to 3 was used to reflect the extent and severity of the damage; the scale of Hood et al [9] has been used to identify damage by our group [19,20] and others [5,7,10,11,14] since 1983. It is a subjective score that does not assess wear directly, but instead qualitatively identifies damage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, like Engh et al [174], Harman et al detected no difference between the revision specimens and autopsy specimens [175]. Rohrbach et al also studied both revision and autopsy specimens, and used an elaborate scoring scheme to measure wear and damage [176]. Both retrieved groups showed fatigue and wear damage.…”
Section: Total Knee Replacementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Time in situ did not change first generation ingrowth [179]. However, time in situ directly correlated with increased wear especially for fatigue failure in PCA and Duracon prostheses [176]. Kinematics showed wear predominantly in those areas of highest contact femoral tibial articulation on motion fluoroscopics, stair climbing, and gait.…”
Section: Total Knee Replacementmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation