Patient Attachment Orientation and the Early Working Alliance-A Study of Patient and Therapist Reports of Alliance Quality and Ruptures

Eames, Vicky; Roth, Anthony

doi:10.1093/ptr/10.4.421

Cited by 217 publications

(180 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

152

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both of these findings are consistent with previous studies. Several studies have found that secure attachment style in therapists was positively associated with therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome (Meyer, Pilkonis, Projetti, Heape, & Egan, 2001;Bartholomew, 1997;Dozier, 1990;Dozier, Lomax, & Tyrell, 1996;Satterfeld & Lyddon, 1998;Eames & Roth, 2000).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Validity of Patient and Therapist Attachment and Introject Styles

Bruck

Winston

Aderholt

et al. 2006

APT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Validity of Patient and Therapist Attachment and Introject Styles

Bruck

Winston

Aderholt

et al. 2006

APT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This has received some empirical support in the psychotherapeutic literature (Dolan et al, 1993;Eames & Roth, 2000). In a study of 30 clinical psychology out-patients, Eames & Roth found that patients classified as fearful using Bartholomew's classification (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991), i.e.…”

Section: Patient Attachment the Working Alliance And How Patients Mamentioning

confidence: 97%

Attachment theory in adult psychiatry. Part 2: Importance to the therapeutic relationship

Ma¹

2007

Adv. psychiatr. treat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

), and is also an associate clinical teacher at the University of Warwick. His interests include the contribution of attachment theory to personality development and the help-seeking literature, and the assessment of attachment in adolescence and adulthood. This is the second of two articles by Kenneth Ma discussing attachment theory in general adult psychiatry. The first article (Ma, 2006), which should be read in conjunction with the current one, gave an overview of attachment theory, and outlined some of the latest research into the relationship between attachment and different psychiatric disorders. Case vignette 1Mr G. is a 39-year-old man who has had episodes of schizophrenia since the age of 17. He lives on his own. Since his diagnosis, he has been hospitalised six times because of uncontrolled auditory hallucinations and delusions of persecution; the most recent hospitalisation occurred 2 years ago. For the past 7 years, his keyworker has been Mr S., a community psychiatric nurse with whom Mr G. has formed a trusting relationship. Owing to staff shortage, Mr G. is reviewed medically by the senior house officer (SHO) on the team rather than the consultant; this means that he has to meet a new doctor every 6 months. At Mr G.'s latest outpatient psychiatric appointment, the SHO (who was meeting the patient for the first time) suggested that Mr G.'s antipsychotic medication be increased, as it was reported that his auditory hallucinations were becoming more prominent. Mr G. at first denied the increase in positive symptoms and objected strenuously to the proposed medication change. However, in consultation with Mr S., who attended the appointment with him, he admitted to a deterioration in his mental state and accepted the increase in medication. Staff as attachment figuresThe idea that patients can come to regard mental health professionals as attachment figures (even if for a limited time period) has been argued cogently by a number of authors (Bowlby, 1988;Dozier et al, 1994;Adshead, 1998;Goodwin, 2003;Wilkinson, 2003), although this has not always been backed up by empirical research. Psychiatric staff who function as caregivers may play an important role in providing both a secure base for patients whose attachment needs are activated during periods of distress and corrective experiences that disconfirm patients' insecure 'internal working models' of attachment relationships (see Ma, 2006), thus enabling more secure ways of interacting with others. The case vignette of Mr G. with which I opened this article illustrates the secure base function that can be fulfilled by individual keyworkers. During his illness, Mr G. has met a series of different doctors at different stages of their training. His attachment system is activated during an appointment with another new doctor, which makes it difficult for him to accept medical advice from this relative stranger. However, the presence of Mr S., with whom he has developed a secure attachment over the years, enabled Mr G. to accept the change in medication. Thi...

show abstract

“…In addition to these intrapsychic factors, patient interpersonal characteristics have been shown to relate to the alliance. Specifically, patient attachment style has been associated with the therapeutic alliance in several studies such that patients with secure attachment styles were more likely to have favorable therapeutic relationships, while those with fearful, preoccupied, anxious, or dismissive attachments had more difficulty establishing or maintaining a good alliance (e.g., Dolan, Arnkoff & Glass, 1993;Eames & Roth, 2000;Rubino, Barker, Roth, & Fearson, 2000).…”

Section: Correlates Of the Therapeutic Alliancementioning

confidence: 99%