Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ImportanceLittle is known about the nature of change in goals of care (GOC) over time among adolescents and younger adult (AYA) patients aged 12 to 39 years with cancer near the end of life. Understanding how GOC evolve may guide clinicians in supporting AYA patients in making end-of-life decisions.ObjectiveTo assess frequency, timing, and evolution of documented GOC among AYA patients with cancer in the last 90 days of life.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study included a retrospective review of medical records from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California of AYA patients with cancer who were 12 to 39 years of age at death and who died between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024.ExposuresStage IV cancer or stage I-III cancer with new metastasis or recurrence.Main Outcome and MeasuresThe primary outcome was documented GOC discussions, categorized by timing before death as initial (>60 days), middle (31-60 days), or late (≤30 days). Goals were classified as palliative, nonpalliative, undecided, or not discussed. Subgroup analysis according to race and ethnicity were also performed.ResultsAmong 1929 AYA patients with a mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis of 28 (8) years, 1049 (54.5%) were female; 5 (0.3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 227 (11.8%) were Asian, 157 (8.1%) were Black or African American, 14 (0.7%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 1184 (61.4%) were White, 11 (0.6%) were of more than 1 race, 38 (2.0%) were categorized as other race, 293 (15.2%) were without documented race, 514 (26.6%) were Hispanic or Latino, 762 (39.5%) were not Hispanic or Latino, and 653 (33.9%) had no documented ethnicity. Few AYA patients had palliative goals documented in the initial period (139 [7.2%]), increasing to 331 (17.2%) in the middle period and 1113 (57.7%) in the late period. In total, 393 patients (20.4%) transitioned from documented nonpalliative goals in the initial or middle periods to palliative goals by the late period. Many patients had no documented GOC discussion until close to death (initial, 1364 [70.7%]; middle, 969 [50.2%]; and late, 322 [16.7%]). Among the 1929 patients, non-White patients were disproportionately represented among those not having documented GOC discussions (Black, 30 of 157 [19.1%]; Asian, 45 of 227 [19.8%]; and other or undocumented race, 80 of 361 [22.2%]) compared with White patients (167 of 1184 [14.1%]) (P < .001) as were Hispanic or Latino patients (116 of 514 [22.6%]) compared with non-Hispanic patients (93 of 762 [12.2%]) (P < .001) and individuals with no ethnicity documented (113 of 653 [17.3%]) (P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of AYA patients who died of cancer, palliative goals were rarely documented before the last month of life, highlighting the need for timely and ongoing GOC discussions.
ImportanceLittle is known about the nature of change in goals of care (GOC) over time among adolescents and younger adult (AYA) patients aged 12 to 39 years with cancer near the end of life. Understanding how GOC evolve may guide clinicians in supporting AYA patients in making end-of-life decisions.ObjectiveTo assess frequency, timing, and evolution of documented GOC among AYA patients with cancer in the last 90 days of life.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study included a retrospective review of medical records from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California of AYA patients with cancer who were 12 to 39 years of age at death and who died between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024.ExposuresStage IV cancer or stage I-III cancer with new metastasis or recurrence.Main Outcome and MeasuresThe primary outcome was documented GOC discussions, categorized by timing before death as initial (>60 days), middle (31-60 days), or late (≤30 days). Goals were classified as palliative, nonpalliative, undecided, or not discussed. Subgroup analysis according to race and ethnicity were also performed.ResultsAmong 1929 AYA patients with a mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis of 28 (8) years, 1049 (54.5%) were female; 5 (0.3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 227 (11.8%) were Asian, 157 (8.1%) were Black or African American, 14 (0.7%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 1184 (61.4%) were White, 11 (0.6%) were of more than 1 race, 38 (2.0%) were categorized as other race, 293 (15.2%) were without documented race, 514 (26.6%) were Hispanic or Latino, 762 (39.5%) were not Hispanic or Latino, and 653 (33.9%) had no documented ethnicity. Few AYA patients had palliative goals documented in the initial period (139 [7.2%]), increasing to 331 (17.2%) in the middle period and 1113 (57.7%) in the late period. In total, 393 patients (20.4%) transitioned from documented nonpalliative goals in the initial or middle periods to palliative goals by the late period. Many patients had no documented GOC discussion until close to death (initial, 1364 [70.7%]; middle, 969 [50.2%]; and late, 322 [16.7%]). Among the 1929 patients, non-White patients were disproportionately represented among those not having documented GOC discussions (Black, 30 of 157 [19.1%]; Asian, 45 of 227 [19.8%]; and other or undocumented race, 80 of 361 [22.2%]) compared with White patients (167 of 1184 [14.1%]) (P < .001) as were Hispanic or Latino patients (116 of 514 [22.6%]) compared with non-Hispanic patients (93 of 762 [12.2%]) (P < .001) and individuals with no ethnicity documented (113 of 653 [17.3%]) (P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of AYA patients who died of cancer, palliative goals were rarely documented before the last month of life, highlighting the need for timely and ongoing GOC discussions.
Purpose of review Adolescents with haematological malignancies within adult services, in the UK from 16 years old, have unique needs and require developmentally targeted services and approaches to care delivery. High-risk intensive treatments are common for this cohort and a better understanding of what individualised supportive and palliative care means in this context is required. Recent findings Being known and understood as an emerging adult, with particular recognition of developmental stage, is an essential component of quality measures and underpins the adolescent, and caregiver, experience when faced with an uncertain or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP). Healthcare professionals (HCPs) can experience increased emotional labour and feelings of professional inadequacy when caring for adolescents with UPCP. Therapeutic alliance improves HCPs understanding of optimum individualised care by improving communication and supported decision making. Access to training and support for HCPs is required to address the emotional impact of therapeutic alliance with teenage/adolescent and young adults (T/AYAs) with advanced cancer. Summary Investment in therapeutic alliance, alongside robust support mechanisms and targeted training, can improve the skills, confidence and wellbeing for HCPs, and can also ensure optimum individualised care for T/AYAs with UPCP. Evidence for optimum care for adolescents with advanced cancer is relatively scarce, especially for younger T/AYAs (16–24) in the UK who sit within adult services. Further evaluation of the impact of current UK expertise, services and programs are needed to inform future development.
IntroductionDiminished levels of meaning in life can have a range of detrimental effects on cancer patients, including heightened anxiety, depression, psychological distress, reduced quality of life and, in severe cases, even thoughts of suicide. Notably, young and middle-aged cancer patients often exhibit even lower levels of meaning in life compared with their counterparts in other age groups. The primary objective of this study is to formulate a meaning in life intervention programme and assess its efficacy in enhancing the meaning in life and other relevant indicators among young and middle-aged cancer patients.Methods and analysisA prospective, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted. Eighty-eight young and middle-aged cancer patients will be randomised into either the intervention or control group. The intervention group will receive 4 week, six-session, group-based meaning in life intervention programme, while the control group will receive treatment as usual. The primary outcome is meaning in life, and secondary outcomes are post-traumatic growth and psychological distress. These indicators will be assessed at baseline, on completion of the intervention and again 2 months following its conclusion.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Hospital (2202-53-04-2301A-2310B). The study results will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Trial registration numberChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200060672.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.