Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine patient satisfaction with the pre-operative anaesthetist visit. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to September 2023. All consecutive elective patients operated under anaesthesia during the study period were interviewed 24 hours after the operation. Data were collected by the Leiden peri-operative patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) within 24 hours postoperatively. SPSS 26 version was used for data analysis. The chi-square test was used to compare pre-operative visits and patient satisfaction.RESULTS230 elective patients were operated upon under anaesthesia during the study period. Among all sections, the Fear and concern factor has the highest Cronbach alpha, 0.942. almost half of the patients aged 26-35 (42.2%) were female (56.3%), Class I in ASA physical status (50.2%), and living in a rural area (64.9%). For occupation, the majority of respondents were unemployed (89.2%). In addition, more than half of the respondents received general anaesthesia (60.6%). The most frequent procedure type was the gynaecology procedure (38%). Regarding an anaesthetist's visit, most respondents received a pre-operative anaesthetist visit (89.6%) and an anaesthetist approach (73.6%). However, the majority didn't receive adequate information, didn’t have a chance to choose the type of anaesthesia, and didn’t have an opportunity to ask a question, with percentages of 68%, 90%, and 95.2%, respectively. A significant and strong association existed between patient satisfaction and pre-operative anaesthetist visits (P<0.000). CONCLUSION Patient satisfaction with the pre-operative anaesthetic evaluation was the same compared with the Royal College of Anaesthetists standards. There is an association between pre-operative anaesthetist visits and patient satisfaction. Pre-operative anaesthetic evaluation should be emphasized.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine patient satisfaction with the pre-operative anaesthetist visit. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to September 2023. All consecutive elective patients operated under anaesthesia during the study period were interviewed 24 hours after the operation. Data were collected by the Leiden peri-operative patient satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) within 24 hours postoperatively. SPSS 26 version was used for data analysis. The chi-square test was used to compare pre-operative visits and patient satisfaction.RESULTS230 elective patients were operated upon under anaesthesia during the study period. Among all sections, the Fear and concern factor has the highest Cronbach alpha, 0.942. almost half of the patients aged 26-35 (42.2%) were female (56.3%), Class I in ASA physical status (50.2%), and living in a rural area (64.9%). For occupation, the majority of respondents were unemployed (89.2%). In addition, more than half of the respondents received general anaesthesia (60.6%). The most frequent procedure type was the gynaecology procedure (38%). Regarding an anaesthetist's visit, most respondents received a pre-operative anaesthetist visit (89.6%) and an anaesthetist approach (73.6%). However, the majority didn't receive adequate information, didn’t have a chance to choose the type of anaesthesia, and didn’t have an opportunity to ask a question, with percentages of 68%, 90%, and 95.2%, respectively. A significant and strong association existed between patient satisfaction and pre-operative anaesthetist visits (P<0.000). CONCLUSION Patient satisfaction with the pre-operative anaesthetic evaluation was the same compared with the Royal College of Anaesthetists standards. There is an association between pre-operative anaesthetist visits and patient satisfaction. Pre-operative anaesthetic evaluation should be emphasized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.