ObjectivesPain is a common complication in head and neck cancer. The aim of this paper
is to evaluate the evidence from randomised control trials investigating
pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of pain management in head
and neck cancer.Material and MethodsMedline, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were searched. Squamous
cell carcinomas of the head and neck excluding nasopharyngeal and salivary
gland cancers were included. The limits were "human" and
"randomised clinical trials". A quality assessment was carried
out.Results13 studies were included with a total of 644 participants. The primary
outcome for most of these papers was pain control post-treatment. Levels of
bias varied between the studies. Majority (12 out of the 13 studies)
reported intervention to be superior to the control or standard therapy in
pain management. Only 46% of the studies were carried out on an intention to
treat basis. Two studies reported high dropout rates, with one at 66%.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from randomised clinical trials to suggest an
optimal pharmacological intervention for head and neck cancer pain
post-treatment. Further high quality randomised clinical trials should be
conducted to develop an optimal management strategy for head and neck cancer
pain.