Patient demographic and psychosocial characteristics associated with 30‐day recall of self‐reported lower urinary tract symptoms

Abstract

Aims Measurement of self‐reported lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) typically uses a recall period, for example, “In the past 30 days….” Compared to averaged daily reports, 30‐day recall is generally unbiased, but recall bias varies by item. We examined the associations between personal characteristics (eg, age, symptom bother) and 30‐day recall of LUTS using items from the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Comprehensive Assessment of Self‐reported Urinary Symptoms questionnaire. Methods Participants (127 women and 127 men) were recruited from 6 US tertiary care sites. They completed daily assessments for 30 days and a 30‐day recall assessment at the end of the study month. For each of the 18 tested items, representing 10 LUTS, the average of the participant's daily responses was modeled as a function of their 30‐day recall, the personal characteristic, and the interaction between the 30‐day recall and the characteristic in separate general linear regression models, adjusted for sex. Results Nine items representing 7 LUTS exhibited under‐ or overreporting (recall bias) for at least 25% of participants. Bias was associated with personal characteristics for six LUTS. Underreporting of incontinence was associated with older age, lower anxiety, and negative affect; overreporting of other LUTS was associated with, symptom bother, symptom variability, anxiety, and depression. Conclusions We identified under‐ or overreporting that was associated with personal characteristics for six common LUTS. Some cues (eg, less bother and lower anxiety) were related to recall bias in an unexpected direction. Thus, providers should exercise caution when making judgments about the accuracy of a patient's symptom recall based on patient demographic and psychosocial characteristics.

Comparison of weekly and daily recall of pain as an endpoint in a randomized phase 3 trial of cabozantinib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

“…Gender and age-based demographic variation has previously been detected in the magnitude of the differences between symptom ratings recalled over a period of 1 week or longer and daily ratings. 38,44,45 The sign of the differences at least remained consistent with the broader population. Greater representation of minority groups would enable further investigation of demographic variation in ratings and strengthen future studies.…”

The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period

“…Using a recall period shorter than the 4 weeks initially assigned to the OES might also be beneficial when a systematic increase or decrease (temporal trends) in symptoms can be expected to occur over 4 weeks, for example, while patients are recovering from an injury or surgery, as was the case for the patients included in the current study. In fact, the presence of variations in symptoms over the course of a recall period, 5 , 11 , 41 in particular temporal trends, 40 has been found to threaten the accuracy of rating symptoms by recall. It appears reasonable that longer recall periods might be more vulnerable to these effects.…”

Do Patients Accurately Recall Their Preoperative Symptoms After Elective Orthopedic Procedures?

“…Outside of orthopedic surgery, other medical fields have also investigated the effects of patient recall bias on reported outcomes. For example, Flynn et al assessed 30-day patient-reported recall of urinary tract infection symptoms in 254 patients [ 32 ]. They found that recall bias significantly affected answers on nine items that were tested, among 25% of the study population.…”