2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-derived bladder cancer xenografts: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the subcutaneous heterotopic approach is used to establish urothelial tumor PDX models, reasonably high take-rates can be expected. In a recent systematic review, Bernardo et al looked at 12 studies using PDX models for urothelial carcinoma with an overall take rate of 41% [34], which compares favorably to those of generating PDX of prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma [6,35]. The authors found that Matrigel, a commercially available cell culture matrix consisting of growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins, was also associated with an improved take-rate in bladder tumors.…”
Section: Success Rates Of Engraftmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the subcutaneous heterotopic approach is used to establish urothelial tumor PDX models, reasonably high take-rates can be expected. In a recent systematic review, Bernardo et al looked at 12 studies using PDX models for urothelial carcinoma with an overall take rate of 41% [34], which compares favorably to those of generating PDX of prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma [6,35]. The authors found that Matrigel, a commercially available cell culture matrix consisting of growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins, was also associated with an improved take-rate in bladder tumors.…”
Section: Success Rates Of Engraftmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a very low tumour rate take (10–25%) was reported after implanting tumour fragments of different histotypes in nude mice [810]. The use of NOD-SCID resulted in an increased engraftment rate (25–40%) for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma [1115] and a very high tumour take-rate (from 50 to 80%) has been observed for ovarian cancer, head and neck tumours, metastatic colon and bladder cancer [6, 1618]. In our experience, to establish colon cancer PDXs, we observed that implanting fragments in nude (nu/nu) mice did not produce tumour growth neither at F0 (Fig.…”
Section: Generation Of Pdxsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as PDX models are established from tumors as subcutaneous xenografts in mice, the normal tissue counterpart and surrounding interacting stroma of each patient is missing. Humanized PDX models are costly, difficult to develop and not amenable to high-throughput platforms; in addition, their success rates frequently fall below 30% 42,43 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%