2016
DOI: 10.1038/nm.4238
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and precision oncology

Abstract: Together with recent advances in the processing and culture of human tissue, bioengineering, xenotransplantation and genome editing, Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) present a range of new opportunities for the study of human cancer. Here we discuss the main advantages and limitations of iPSC modeling, and how the method intersects with other patient-derived models of cancer, such as organoids, organson-chips and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). We highlight the opportunities that iPSC models can provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
141
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be possible to overcome this refractoriness by using alternative reprogramming factor cocktails, which we did not test here. A negative or positive impact of specific cancer-associated gene mutations on the reprogramming “fitness” of the cells would not be surprising given well-studied positive and negative effects, respectively, of TP53 inactivation and Fanconi Anemia pathway mutations on reprogramming (Papapetrou, 2016). Importantly, despite the skewed clonal and subclonal representation, we were able to capture normal and preleukemic cells, as well as malignant clones and subclones and thus compile a panel of lines carrying genomes representative of different disease stages from normal to fully transformed states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be possible to overcome this refractoriness by using alternative reprogramming factor cocktails, which we did not test here. A negative or positive impact of specific cancer-associated gene mutations on the reprogramming “fitness” of the cells would not be surprising given well-studied positive and negative effects, respectively, of TP53 inactivation and Fanconi Anemia pathway mutations on reprogramming (Papapetrou, 2016). Importantly, despite the skewed clonal and subclonal representation, we were able to capture normal and preleukemic cells, as well as malignant clones and subclones and thus compile a panel of lines carrying genomes representative of different disease stages from normal to fully transformed states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSC exhibit numerous similarities to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) including morphology, gene expression profiles, in-vitro proliferation, and in-vivo teratoma formation (13, 16). As such, iPSC have emerged as important models with which to study epigenetic mechanisms contributing to pluripotency in normal cells, as well as stemness, chemo-resistance and metastatic phenotypes of cancer cells (17). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro modeling of human disease has been greatly facilitated by iPSCs technologies [8,13]. Characterized by their ability to self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into various cell lineages, iPSCs provide a powerful system for human disease modeling [8,13]. In the present study, we established iPSCs from an MDS patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The identification of distinct human CSCs exerting their potential in patients, including in MDS, has remain elusive [2,3]. In vitro modeling of human disease has been greatly facilitated by iPSCs technologies [8,13]. Characterized by their ability to self-renew indefinitely and differentiate into various cell lineages, iPSCs provide a powerful system for human disease modeling [8,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation