2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient dose in CT angiography examinations: An institutional survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since by using iterative reconstruction, good-quality images can be provided via lower kV and mAs ( Klink et al, 2014 ; Solomon et al, 2017 ). Other studies also show the effect of imaging protocols and reconstruction on radiation dose ( Dimitroukas et al, 2022 ; Metaxas et al, 2022 ). In this study, H2 and H4 were equipped with CT scanners with almost the same features that were eqqipped with iterative reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since by using iterative reconstruction, good-quality images can be provided via lower kV and mAs ( Klink et al, 2014 ; Solomon et al, 2017 ). Other studies also show the effect of imaging protocols and reconstruction on radiation dose ( Dimitroukas et al, 2022 ; Metaxas et al, 2022 ). In this study, H2 and H4 were equipped with CT scanners with almost the same features that were eqqipped with iterative reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT imaging to assess CF lung disease is routinely performed at low dose and without contrast material application at most centres, which is not suitable to detect BAD [ 40 ]. Further, contrast-enhanced CT angiography of the chest which would be required to detect BAD is reserved for the emergency setting and is associated with a much higher radiation dose of ∼5 mSv in adults compared with low-dose CT which averages typically ∼1 mSv [ 41 , 42 ]. Second, we were not able to determine the relationship between the presence of BAD and events of haemoptysis in our study, as this event has not been systematically documented in the database of our study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplex ultrasound, computer tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and invasive angiography have a different sensibility and specificity for detecting peripheral artery disease. For example, when comparing multidetector computer tomography with angiography, the sensitivity and specificity of multidetector computer tomography for detecting peripheral artery disease is 90% [ 97 , 98 , 99 ].…”
Section: Diagnostic Approach To Peripheral Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%