Patient early session experience and treatment outcome

Pesale, Frank P.; Hilsenroth, Mark J.; Owen, Jesse

doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.662607

Cited by 23 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…An example item is “To what extent have your original complaints or symptoms improved?” Higher scores indicate that clients perceived greater improvement in counseling. The PEI has demonstrated evidence of reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from .89 to .94 (Clemence, Hilsenroth, Ackerman, Strassle, & Handler, ; Hatcher & Barends, ; Pesale, Hilsenroth, & Owen, ). Scores on the PEI have also been linked to symptom improvement during counseling (Owen & Hilsenroth, ; Pesale et al, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microaggressions and Perceptions of Cultural Humility in Counseling

Davis

DeBlaere

Brubaker

et al. 2016

Jour of Counseling & Develop

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to explore how microaggressions affect counseling outcomes. Participants were 128 racial/ethnic minority individuals who had been in counseling within the past year. Results indicated that identity attributions were associated with counseling outcomes (i.e., working alliance and perceived improvement in counseling). Furthermore, perceptions of cultural humility mediated the relationship between negative emotion due to rupture and counseling outcomes (i.e., working alliance and perceived improvement in counseling).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microaggressions and Perceptions of Cultural Humility in Counseling

Davis

DeBlaere

Brubaker

et al. 2016

Jour of Counseling & Develop

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Duan and Kivlighan (2002) used it as session outcome measure, highlighting how a clinician's empathy seems to be in a relation with his or her SEQ's Depth dimension. Pesale and colleagues (Pesale, Hilsenroth, & Owen, 2012) considered the dimensions of the SEQ in relation to outcomes during psychodynamic psychotherapy, and they obtained meaningful results: even if patients' Depth rating was not found to be significantly related to outcome, higher patients' Smoothness dimension was linked to patients' improvement at the end of treatment in terms of global psychopathology and broad-range functioning, with a decrease in general symptoms. Finally, in Italy, Lingiardi, Colli, Gentile and Tanzilli (2011) used the translation of the SEQ Depth scale to assess the depth of psychotherapy sessions from an external rater's perspective.…”

Section: N O N -C O M M E R C I a L U S E O N L Ymentioning

confidence: 99%

A pilot study of the Italian adaptation of the Session Evaluation Questionnaire fourth version

Rocco

Salcuni

Antonelli

2017

ResPsy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) measures the impact of counselling and psychotherapy sessions; it may be conceived as a bridge between psychotherapy process and outcome. Even if the original American SEQ has been translated into many languages, only a few translations have been validated. This is a pilot study that attempted to replicate the five-dimensional structure of the fourth version of the Anglo-American SEQ, for the Italian population. The SEQ is a self-report tool asking patients about their experience with the clinical session just ended; it consists of 27 adjectives in semantic differential scale, divided into three thematic parts: evaluation of the session itself, feelings after the session, and evaluation of the therapist. Data were collected on 111 outpatients attending the Dynamic Psychological Service for University Students, after their first two clinical interviews. Exploratory factor analyses were performed on each of the three parts of the SEQ. Results confirmed the original factorial structure, for Depth, Smoothness, Positivity and Arousal dimensions; Good Therapist dimension overlapped perfectly with the original one. The Italian SEQ showed adequate internal consistency. Convergent validity measured with an index of perceived satisfaction in the counselling process showed significant positive correlations. This pilot study showed that the Italian SEQ is a reliable instrument to measure the impact of clinical sessions. Validation studies are needed, especially to replicate the factor structure of the instrument and to better assess its validity.

show abstract

“…O SEQ é uma escala desenvolvida originalmente em língua inglesa e já traduzida adaptada para, pelo menos, 13 outros idiomas, conforme, conforme registro do autor (Stiles, 2016); portanto, amplamente utilizada na literatura (Hafkenscheid, 2009;Stiles, Gordon, & Lani, 2002). Estudos utilizando o SEQ encontraram correlação positiva entre as medidas de "Profundidade" e "Complacência", do ponto de vista do cliente, com o desfecho da terapia e a aliança terapêutica (Kivlighan, Marmarosh, & Hilsenroth, 2014;Mallinckrodt, 1993;Muran et al, 2009;Pesale, Hilsenroth, & Owen, 2012;Shapiro, Weatherford, Kaufman, & Broenen, 1994). Os fatores relativos ao humor pós-sessão dos clientes ("Positividade" e "Excitação"), apresentaram correlações positivas com o desfecho e a aliança terapêutica (Kivlighan et al, 2014;Mallinckrodt, 1993;Pesale et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Tradução e adaptação cultural do Questionário de Avaliação de Sessões (Session Evaluation Questionnaire) para o português do Brasil

Ramos¹,

Pantet²,

Almeida³

et al. 2019

perspectivas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Avaliações da eficácia da psicoterapia, bem como da diferença de eficácia entre tipos diferentes de psicoterapia, têm grande relevância tanto científica quanto social. Os critérios adotados para avaliação dos processos psicoterapêuticos incluem, além de resultados, medidas relacionadas à eficiência, custo e avaliação do tratamento pelo paciente. Dentre estas medidas, destaca-se o Questionário de Avaliação de Sessões (“Session Evaluation Questionnaire” – SEQ), desenvolvido para avaliar e comparar a percepção do cliente e do terapeuta, independentemente, ao final de cada sessão. O objetivo do presente estudo foi fazer uma tradução e adaptação cultural, para uso no Brasil, da versão mais recente do SEQ. Foi traduzida a quinta versão do SEQ, que inclui 21 itens em formato “likert” de 7 pontos, com escolhas entre pares de adjetivos. O processo de tradução foi conduzido em cinco etapas: tradução, síntese, tradução reversa, revisão e pré-teste. A versão final em português foi aplicada em uma amostra independente de clientes e terapeutas (N=36) a fim de realizar uma análise de consistência interna da escala. A escala e seus fatores apresentaram bons níveis de consistência interna, o que aponta para uma boa qualidade desta versão, tornando-a passível de comparação às versões em outros idiomas.

show abstract

Patient early session experience and treatment outcome

Cited by 23 publications

References 25 publications

Microaggressions and Perceptions of Cultural Humility in Counseling

Microaggressions and Perceptions of Cultural Humility in Counseling

A pilot study of the Italian adaptation of the Session Evaluation Questionnaire fourth version

Tradução e adaptação cultural do Questionário de Avaliação de Sessões (Session Evaluation Questionnaire) para o português do Brasil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About