2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16142482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Education and Continuing Medical Education to Promote Shared Decision-Making. A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Background: Over recent years, the use of decision aids to promote shared decision-making have been examined. Studies on patient education and on continuing medical education for physicians are less common. This review analyzes intervention and evaluation studies on patient education and continuing medical education which aim to enhance shared decision-making. The following study parameters are of interest: Study designs, objectives, numbers of participants in the education courses, interventions, primary resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that greater patient-perceived involvement in decision making is associated with greater trust in the clinician (49)(50)(51). Studies of communication training tools for clinicians and communication aids for patients suggest training clinicians is more effective than decision-making tools for patients, but neither improves patient experience (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57). For instance, one trial in oncology randomized clinicians to receive SDM communication skills training or not, and patients to receive a communication aid or not.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that greater patient-perceived involvement in decision making is associated with greater trust in the clinician (49)(50)(51). Studies of communication training tools for clinicians and communication aids for patients suggest training clinicians is more effective than decision-making tools for patients, but neither improves patient experience (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57). For instance, one trial in oncology randomized clinicians to receive SDM communication skills training or not, and patients to receive a communication aid or not.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, feedback was provided according to the PRESS Guideline [ 35 ] by a health services researcher with experience in conducting reviews (A.W.) [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The developed PubMed search string was adapted to each of the other databases CINAHL, PsycInfo, and PSYNDEX (see Appendix A ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDM is composed of the following important elements: (1) it involves healthcare professionals and patients, (2) both sides share information, (3) both sides are in a course to build a consensus of the preferred treatment, and (4) a treatment agreement is reached and implemented [13]. Patient education plays an important role in the SDM [14]. It helps patients to be capable of asking more questions and expressing a greater desire for involvement during a consultation.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%