Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids

Abstract

Background A 2017 systematic review suggested patient engagement in clinical trials has been limited, with little active engagement in trial design or data analysis, interpretation or dissemination. Additionally, there remains limited sex/gender reporting in clinical trial research. Objectives The overall goal of this project was to disseminate sex/gender knowledge and build capacity for patient engagement in clinical trials. Specific objectives were to (1) create capacity and identify opportunities for patient engagement in clinical trials and sponsor-or investigator-led activities (e.g. clinical trial design and conduct); and (2) enhance new/early investigator sex/gender knowledge and skills related to patient-oriented research (POR). Methods We used the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Capacity Development Framework and the SPOR Patient Engagement Framework to guide three phases of this project: (1) conduct a scoping review using methods described by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI) and the Coordinating Centre at the Institute of Education (Phase 1); (2) host a 1-day POR consultation workshop (Phase 2); and (3) deliver a new/early investigator POR training day (Phase 3). Six electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, the Cochrane Library, and AMED) were searched from 1996 using keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms in accordance with the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) and the search criteria in the bibliographic databases. Standard approaches were used to search the grey literature. Results A total of 79 studies and over 150 websites were subject to data abstraction by team members, capturing information on sex/gender and SPOR's patient engagement guiding principles of inclusiveness, support, mutual respect, and co-building. Results were presented to 32 key stakeholders at the consultation workshop and input was sought on next steps using nominal group techniques. Based on the plethora of existing POR resources, relevant POR information from the scoping review was collated into two decision aids (patient and investigator) to determine readiness to engage with/as a patient partner in a clinical trial. The decision aids were presented at a POR training day with 88 new/early investigators, clinicians, patient partners and decision makers. The decision aids showed 'good' usability, assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Attendees thought the decision aids were engaging, they increased their understanding of sex/gender, patient engagement and POR, and they would recommend them to others. POR principles and practices were integrated across all phases of the project. Patient partners (1) identified research priorities/search terms; (2) collected/analyzed data; (3) designed the patient partner decision aid; and (4) disseminated the results through presentation. Conclusion Our digital patient partner and investigator decision aids are the first to provide information technology to d...

Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter

“…The International Association for Public Participation has defined five levels of engagement outlining the impact of partnership with patients in CTs, which are intrinsically conveyed in the Charter—inform, consult, involve, collaborate, and empower [ 2 ]. The Charter offers a unique and tangible framework for cancer CT stakeholders to commit to and to gauge their organizations’ patient centricity in CTs.…”

“…Establishing partnerships with patients and patient groups (PGs) to engage them in all levels of clinical trials (CTs), including in real-world evidence research, is increasingly explored and applied globally [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Keys to such engagement—also referred to as co-design research, participatory research, patient-oriented research (POR), patient-involved research, patient public involvement, patient participation, co-creative research, citizen science, patient-centric initiative, open science—are the understanding and the manifestation of the concept of patient centricity or patient centeredness [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”

“…Advantages of involving the end-user groups in the broad research agenda include increased research relevance to both clinicians and patients [ 1 ], with positive impacts reported in setting research priorities, developing proposals, recruiting and retaining patients, as well as disseminating results, including societal and ethical benefits [ 2 , 4 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Guidelines and recommendations are emerging on research partnerships with patients, which support the principles of trust, respect, and co-learning [ 2 , 7 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 34 ]. These include POR training for all team members, tools/resources for successful patient engagement, and value for patient partnerships across various stages of the research cycle.…”

Integrating Patient-Centred Research in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group

“…Establishing partnerships with patients to engage them in all levels of development and execution of clinical trials (CTs) is increasingly being explored and applied globally [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Including the patient perspective when designing research studies or setting the research agenda is new to the Canadian research landscape compared to frameworks such as the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) in the US or INVOLVE (UK national advisory group) in the UK [ 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”

Patient-Oriented Research from the ISDM 2019 Conference: A Legacy Now More Relevant Than Ever

“…First, patients had and will continue to have an active voice in guiding future research in SDM. In this issue of The Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research, you will find selected papers that represent a sample of the benefits of such patient-oriented research in the production of decision aids to support patient engagement in clinical trials [16], to empower patients with complex care needs in guiding their case management [17], to undergo a computerized head tomography for mild traumatic brain injury [18] and to guide pain management [19]. You will also discover best-worst scaling methods to engage patients in identifying surgical complications they want to be informed about [20] and use of social media to determine what is important for citizens during end-of-life discussions [21].…”