2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient evaluation of outcomes of external rhinoplasty for unilateral cleft lip and palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients would undergo the procedure again knowing the final result, which is in accordance with both studies on patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty published up to the present time. 9,10 Using the validated ROE, we found a mean increase in scores from 39.3 preoperatively to 73.1 postoperatively (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All patients would undergo the procedure again knowing the final result, which is in accordance with both studies on patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty published up to the present time. 9,10 Using the validated ROE, we found a mean increase in scores from 39.3 preoperatively to 73.1 postoperatively (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Each of these components requires particular attention during planning the surgery. Secondary cleft rhinoplasty usually attempts to improve the nasal tip, dorsum, alar position, and symmetry of the nostrils (Sàndor and Ylikontiola, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardised, valid and reliable methods for evaluating success in facial cosmetic procedures including rhinoplasty are still lacking (Moolenburgh et al, 2008b;Kosowski et al, 2009). Subjective patient reporting and clinicians' opinions on treatment outcomes, albeit controversial, seem to be biased (Eliason et al, 1991;Marcusson et al, 2002;Sharp and Rowe-Jones, 2003;Al-Omari et al, 2005;Sàndor and Ylikontiola, 2006;Meyer-Marcotty and Stellzig-Eisenhauer, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have been undertaken to evaluate the result of different rhinoplastic procedures 3,10,12,13,16,19,21,25 , but quantification of surgical changes remains difficult. Besides direct anthropometric measurements 7 , two-dimensional (2D) photographs and radiographs are used to document and calculate the changes after surgery 23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%