Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review

Abstract

Background Recent events in healthcare reform have brought national attention to integrating patient experiences and expectations into quality metrics. Few studies have comprehensively evaluated the effect of patient expectations on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgery. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available literature describing the relationship between patient expectations and postoperative PROs. Methods We performed a search of the literature published prior to November 1, 2012. Articles were included in the review if 1) primary data were presented 2) patient expectations regarding a surgical procedure were measured 3) PROs were measured, and 4) the relationship between patient expectations and PROs was specifically examined. PROs were categorized into five subgroups: satisfaction, quality of life (QOL), disability, mood disorder, and pain. We examined each study to determine the relationship between patient expectations and PROs as well as study quality. Results From the initial literature search yielding 1,708 studies, 60 articles were included. Fulfillment of expectations was associated with improved PROs among 24 studies. Positive expectations were correlated with improved PROs for 28 (47%) studies, and poorer PROs for 9 (15%) studies. Eighteen studies reported that fulfillment of expectations was correlated with improved patient satisfaction, and 10 studies identified that positive expectations were correlated with improved postoperative QOL. Finally, patients with positive preoperative expectations reported less pain (8 studies) and disability (15 studies) compared with patients with negative preoperative expectations. Conclusions Patient expectations are inconsistently correlated with PROs following surgery, and there is no accepted method to capture perioperative expectations. Future efforts to rigorously measure expectations and explore their influence on postoperative outcomes can inform clinicians and policy-makers seeking to integrate PROs into measures of surgical quality.

Patients’ perspective on surgical intervention for Dupuytren’s disease – experiences, expectations and appraisal of results

“…However, evidence concerning the importance of fulfilment of preoperative expectations is inconclusive [38]. The present study shows that unfulfilled expectations can be one reason for a negative view of the intervention outcome, and this is in line with previous research findings arguing for the importance of fulfilment of expectations [30,39].…”

“…Expectations are multifaceted [40] and may evolve and change [34], and can therefore be difficult to measure [38]. In the present study, expectations of the trajectory of illness changed over time.…”

A Promise to Our Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease

“…Yet in surgery inconsistency is common, and a sedulous sense of urgency must be established to stay ahead of the curve in the rapidly evolving delivery of health care in North America and the world. 4 In this month's issue, Wood et al, 5 in their paper entitled ''Surgical Management of Bone Metastases: Quality of Evidence and Systematic Review,'' attempt to address the question of just how well we are doing to help our MBD patients by employing a very stringent literature review. While patients afflicted with MBD may have limited life expectancies, we must still strive to optimize patient satisfaction and reported outcomes.…”

Independent predictors of reliability between full time employee-dependent acquisition of functional outcomes compared to non-full time employee-dependent methodologies: a prospective single institutional study

“…Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become increasingly popular in assessing post-surgical interventions, especially post-spine surgeries, and are becoming the new standard for measuring many clinical outcomes (1,2). Multiple factors are incorporated in the PROs collected and assessed for post-surgical interventions.…”

“…Multiple factors are incorporated in the PROs collected and assessed for post-surgical interventions. In a systematic review of 13,806 post-surgical patients, Waljee and colleagues found of the PROs available 64% of the patients were assessed for disability and 25% for pain, with only 5% assessed for mood disorders (2).…”