Patient-centered care is lauded as a cornerstone of patient satisfaction. 1 The literature supporting this is largely derived from studies in clinical settings where there is no imminent life threat, typically within the primary care, cancer, or chronic illness domains. 2 In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Kaufman and colleagues 3 report their findings from a qualitative study designed to understand trauma resuscitation, where there is a potential life threat, from a patient-centered perspective. The authors report variability in patients' experiences of pain, treatments, and communication within the trauma bay and downstream effects on patient satisfaction. 3 We are reminded that different patients can perceive the same set of physician words and actions in vastly different ways.Patient centeredness addresses psychosocial aspects of illness ("biopsychosocial perspective"), unraveling the personal meaning of illness ("patient as person"), and incorporating patient preferences ("power sharing") while developing a "therapeutic alliance" and allowing the patient to view the "physician-as-person." 4 Conceptually, applying principles of patient-centered care should serve as the goal for every clinical encounter. 4 However, trauma resuscitation requires reordering of priorities to quickly and systematically assess, and potentially intervene, for life-threatening injuries. Without the luxury of time, the ability to engage in thoughtful conversation and incorporate shared decision making becomes a challenging proposition. 5 Furthermore, with the looming risk of death immediately after serious