2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00647.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives

Abstract: Objective To gain more insight into exclusion mechanisms and inclusion strategies in patient-expert partnerships.Background Patient participation in health research, on the level of Ôpartnerships with expertsÕ is a growing phenomenon. However, little research is conducted whether exclusion mechanisms take place and to what extent patientsÕ perspectives are included in the final outcomes of these partnerships.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this can be an effective approach, this form of representation does not always guarantee that patients' input is taken into account. Patients can be overruled by other members of the board and it can lead to tokenism [12,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this can be an effective approach, this form of representation does not always guarantee that patients' input is taken into account. Patients can be overruled by other members of the board and it can lead to tokenism [12,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ainsi, afin d'accéder au sujet sensible de la passion obsessive et des problèmes de jeu, la recherche future pourrait mettre en place une recherche collaborative de type ) patient-partenaire * impliquant des JdP, cette technique étant reconnue pour augmenter la qualité de la recherche. En raison de la complémentarité des connaissances expérientielles des personnes concernées, soit les joueurs, et des experts scientifiques, cette méthode pourrait être envisagée dans les recherches futures (Elberse, Caron-Flinterman et Broerse, 2011;Goodare et Lockwood, 2009) Ces résultats doivent être interprétés à la lumière de certaines limites. Une sélection de joueurs par choix raisonné à partir de l'échantillon de convenance de la cohorte (noms des auteurs masqués pour une révision à l'aveugle) a pu restreindre la diversité des profils des JdP.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The autonomy paradigm aims at emancipating the elderly from the passive situation in which the active ageing paradigm confines them [29,35,38,[46][47][48] and, in order to achieve this objective, it promotes the direct and first-person involvement of the seniors in healthcare decisions as well as in technological design [35,[49][50][51]. The paradigm revolves around the concepts of autonomy and self-determination [35,39,46,47]-or, as Kaufman claims, autonomy as self-determination [20] (p. 47).…”
Section: The Ageing Process: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%