Patient-Identified Barriers and Facilitators to Pre-Visit Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Completion in Patients With Hip and Knee Pain

Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion

“…The analysis showed that different types of pre-visit techniques have been employed by authors to facilitate office visits and patient care. All of these plans can be categorized into eight different categories, utilizing an electronic pre-office checklist with 12 studies (24.5%) [ 25 , 29 – 35 , 48 , 58 , 59 , 68 ], educating patients and support them before each visit in form of online and offline source of information with 12 studies (24.5%) [ 23 , 36 – 42 , 60 – 62 , 66 , 74 ], applying an EHR-linked care program with different checklists and assessment tools with nine studies (18.4%) [ 22 , 43 , 44 , 49 , 63 , 67 , 70 , 71 , 73 ], using paper-based checklists with nine studies (18.4%) [ 45 , 46 , 50 – 52 , 64 , 65 , 69 , 72 ], preparing and assess patient with the pre-visit phone-based intervention with two studies (4.1%) [ 24 , 53 ], using self-triage or self-assessment tools with two studies (4.1%) [ 54 , 55 ], using automatic reminders and sheets with one article (2%) [ 56 ], and using pre-clinic consultation by other health care team member with one article (2%) to prepare the patient for each visit [ 57 ].…”

“…With pre-visit planning, patients and physicians are prepared to make meaningful use of their time during each visit. Furthermore, patients could have an impressive role in clinical decision-making regarding their treatment process [ 25 ]. Hence, several studies have focused on the power of patient-centered care to improve patient care, but no studies have been published to examine the applying pre-visit planning techniques in the context of patient-centered care.…”

Effect of assessment administration method and timing on patient‐reported outcome measures completion and scores: Overview and recommendations

“…From the patient perspective, there is no clear preference on the “best time” to complete PROMs — either previsit at home or at the clinic (Liu, Ohueri, Schryver, Bozic, & Koenig, 2018). However, in addition to simply considering “time” as a reference to previsit at home or at the clinic, one of the assumed benefits of PROMs that should be reflected on is being able to monitor scores over an entire care cycle (e.g., prior to and following an intervention).…”

The Purpose of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Post Its Digitalization and Integration into Clinical Practice: An Interdisciplinary Redefinition Resembling PROs Theoretical and Practical Evolvement

“…Thus, as part of clinical practice, PRO might facilitate a more holistic care approach and an environment promoting patient engagement [49,62,63]. Moreover, PRO is known to promote patient-centered care by capturing and explicating issues that matter to the majority of patients [16,25], since it integrates the patient voice and facilitates patient involvement in health care [64,65]; thus, evidence supports that PRO enhances physician-patient communication [66,67] and that PRO encourage and affects the degree of shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical practice [32,46,50,68]. Furthermore, PRO's facilitation of patient participation might have an empowering effect on patients [3,69,70] and ensure that patients are recognized and treated as individuals, and not merely as diagnoses [18].…”