Patient Inventory: a quality improvement method

Abstract

Providing high quality care requires that patient care pathways are organized according to the needs of the patient. The organization of high-quality integrated patient care requires methods to assess ‘appropriateness’ of the care pathways to identify challenges in delivering the right procedure, for the right person at the right time and setting and with the most appropriate use of resources. There is a need for methods to assess appropriateness that can easily be implemented in daily clinical practice. The Patient Inventory method is such a method. Patient Inventory is a special type of audit that provides a ‘snapshot’ of the patient population in an entire hospital, a ward or another clinical unit. It maps the bed occupancy situation, as well as coordination, continuity and communication associated with the individual patient pathway. The aim is to identify inappropriate or wasteful events and to facilitate reflections on the underlying causes. These reflections are used to identify focus areas for quality improvement efforts. The method answers the question: ‘Is it the right patient in the right place at the right time, and is the correct pathway for the patient organized with the most appropriate use of resources?’ The aim of this method paper is to describe the background, definitions and methodologies for Patient Inventory, to offer a practical guidance for application of the method and to describe the current experiences with the method.

Opbygning af Interorganisatorisk Evalueringskapacitet: Et dansk casestudie af evalueringsprocesser på mikroniveau mellem hospital, de praktiserende læger og kommune

“…Shulha et al (2016). Dette bekraeftes af forskning i intraorganisatorisk patientinventering (Knudsen et al, 2020), der rejses spørgsmål om potentielle bias i interne dataindsamlings-og evalueringsprocesser. Af den empirisk funderede analyse ses, at når parterne på tvaers af organisationer både har forskellige interesser og et faelles ansvar for validiteten i data og undersøgelsernes laeringspotentiale, da fremmer dette kvaliteten i både dataindsamlingen og evalueringsarbejdet.…”