2013
DOI: 10.5750/ejpch.v1i1.634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient involvement and shared decision-making: an analysis of components, models and practical knowledge

Abstract: Patient involvement and shared decision-making are prominent ideas in healthcare policy discourses and the focus of extensive analysis in health services research and social sciences scholarship. In this paper, we reflect on the different kinds of knowledge that might help professionals to more fully translate these ideas and the broader ideals of collaborative healthcare, into everyday clinical practice. To do this, we offer a brief account of 8 components of involvement and indicate the ways in which the plu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RR may be seen as a tool for increased patient involvement, as the app aims at engaging patients in a way that is expected to be more in line with patient preferences than paper‐and‐pen meal diaries (Juarascio et al, ; Research2guidance, ). Thus, in line with Cribb and Donetto (), our results may indicate that the setting at the ED treatment facility studied does not yet have the capability to handle the impact on treatment and work conditions that accompanies the adoption of RR. As this may be the case at other treatment facilities too, we encourage managements and clinicians here to carefully consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of adopting RR before adopting it, and thoroughly discuss the development and application of specific and explicit practical guidelines for clinician and patient app usage fitting the existing setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…RR may be seen as a tool for increased patient involvement, as the app aims at engaging patients in a way that is expected to be more in line with patient preferences than paper‐and‐pen meal diaries (Juarascio et al, ; Research2guidance, ). Thus, in line with Cribb and Donetto (), our results may indicate that the setting at the ED treatment facility studied does not yet have the capability to handle the impact on treatment and work conditions that accompanies the adoption of RR. As this may be the case at other treatment facilities too, we encourage managements and clinicians here to carefully consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of adopting RR before adopting it, and thoroughly discuss the development and application of specific and explicit practical guidelines for clinician and patient app usage fitting the existing setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…From the perspective of both young mothers and students it offered the opportunity to provide honest accounts from an emic perspective that allowed users to confront professional stereotypes, in a safe setting. Young mothers were empowered to challenge professional dominance, arguing that professional assessments sometimes fail to acknowledge how broader social problems and structural disadvantage are experienced by those living with the everyday reality , making health visiting services less accessible (Hogg et al 2012;Cribb and Donetto 2013;Morrow et al 2012). Nevertheless, this study demonstrates the importance of allowing time and resources to support involvement if it is to be meaningful to users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Developing trust as the basis for meaningful service user involvement in research as well as service delivery that is more than tokenistic is in itself important and lay at the heart of this approach (Cleminson and Moesby 2013, Morrow et al 2012, Cribb and Donetto 2013, Wells et al 2008, Tew et al 2004. Challenging traditional power relationships, between professionals and service users can play an important role in shaping student learning in this area as can role modelling user rather than professional led approaches to both research and service development (Cleminson and Moesby 2013, Morrow et al 2012, Cribb and Donetto 2013, Wells et al 2008.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the high specialization may turn the focus away from the individual patient's personal needs and preferences in the provided care. Thus, patient involvement requires an integration of highly specialized functions and interpersonal skills in the health care staff …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%