1994
DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12384205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Measurement of Psoriasis Disease Severity with a Structured Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
67
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to be applicable for the Internet setting, we used a modified version of the SAPASI with direct estimation of BSA involvement. The distribution in our sample of the mSAPASI was 9.5 ± 8.9, which is almost identical to the distribution of the SAPASI in its validation study [40]. Both WLQ and DLQI are instruments with adequate psychometric properties but have not been validated in an Internet setting before [26, 37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to be applicable for the Internet setting, we used a modified version of the SAPASI with direct estimation of BSA involvement. The distribution in our sample of the mSAPASI was 9.5 ± 8.9, which is almost identical to the distribution of the SAPASI in its validation study [40]. Both WLQ and DLQI are instruments with adequate psychometric properties but have not been validated in an Internet setting before [26, 37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The self-administered Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (SAPASI) is a patient-rated instrument with adequate psychometric properties to assess the objective clinical severity of psoria sis [38,39,40,41,42]. To be applicable in the Internet setting, the SAPASI was slightly modified (mSAPASI): as in the original version, patients rated the intensity of erythema, induration and scaliness on a 12-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also in previous studies 6,7,15,16 it was suggested that SAPASI was a good predictor of PASI. An excellent correlation between the 2 scores was found, although with substantial differences in the estimation for individual patients.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To maintain compatibility with the wealth of earlier studies using PASI whilst improving precision in the range of BSA <10%, the validated clinical procedure of PASI measurement is applied with the actual percentage of area involvement instead of the imprecise area classes intervals [6,[9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%