Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective: We aimed to explore patient and provider perspectives of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis healthcare access and service delivery. Methods: We used Interpretive Description, a qualitative approach with the end-goal of informing decisions and actions in clinical practice. Levesque et al.’s “Conceptual framework of access to health care” informed the development of our interview guides. Interviews were conducted virtually and confidentially transcribed verbatim. Data generation and analysis occurred concurrently. Analysis was informed by Braun and Clarke’s six phases of reflexive thematic analysis. Strategies to enhance rigour and trustworthiness of the findings were utilized. Results: We completed 15 interviews: 6 with patients and 9 with providers. Three key themes were generated: (a) Diagnostic hurdles created delay; (b) Hybrid services promote health equity; and (c) Navigating the complexities of a pandemic within a pandemic. Diagnosing tuberculosis was challenging even prior to the pandemic since some providers lacked experience and familiarity with the condition. The diagnostic process was further complicated with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, COVID-19 also introduced streamlined virtual care for patients which was convenient and improved access but was not viewed as being equivalent to in-person care. The intersection of the COVID-19 and tuberculosis pandemics created competition for limited resources while highlighting learnings that may positively impact future tuberculosis care. Conclusions: Our findings can inform health system leadership about how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted care of other public health threats like tuberculosis, helping to prepare more effectively and equitably for future challenges.
Objective: We aimed to explore patient and provider perspectives of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis healthcare access and service delivery. Methods: We used Interpretive Description, a qualitative approach with the end-goal of informing decisions and actions in clinical practice. Levesque et al.’s “Conceptual framework of access to health care” informed the development of our interview guides. Interviews were conducted virtually and confidentially transcribed verbatim. Data generation and analysis occurred concurrently. Analysis was informed by Braun and Clarke’s six phases of reflexive thematic analysis. Strategies to enhance rigour and trustworthiness of the findings were utilized. Results: We completed 15 interviews: 6 with patients and 9 with providers. Three key themes were generated: (a) Diagnostic hurdles created delay; (b) Hybrid services promote health equity; and (c) Navigating the complexities of a pandemic within a pandemic. Diagnosing tuberculosis was challenging even prior to the pandemic since some providers lacked experience and familiarity with the condition. The diagnostic process was further complicated with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, COVID-19 also introduced streamlined virtual care for patients which was convenient and improved access but was not viewed as being equivalent to in-person care. The intersection of the COVID-19 and tuberculosis pandemics created competition for limited resources while highlighting learnings that may positively impact future tuberculosis care. Conclusions: Our findings can inform health system leadership about how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted care of other public health threats like tuberculosis, helping to prepare more effectively and equitably for future challenges.
This systematic review aimed to assess the association between video-observed therapy (VOT) and treatment adherence among TB patients and the benefits and limitations of this treatment modality. The systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow guideline. Multiple databases including Cochrane, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus, Lancet, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ), and BMC were employed to identify relevant articles published between 2012 and 2024. All data were extracted using a standardized data extraction form and both narrative and quantitative approaches were used to present the review outcomes and available evidence. Twenty-nine articles were included in the final analysis, with most using a prospective cohort (n = 10) research design. Treatment adherence rates were relatively higher in TB patients managed using VOT relative to those subjected to direct-observed therapies (DOTs). Likewise, using the VOT approach in most interventional studies lacking a control group depicted higher treatment adherence rates post-intervention. Although asynchronous VOT was used in most studies compared to the synchronous approach, the treatment adherence level was not significantly different between the two methods of VOT delivery. The predominant benefits of VOT include time-saving, cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and fewer self-reported side effects, whereas the main limitation was the privacy of patients’ data and information. Video-directly observed therapy (VDOT) is a promising approach for TB treatment with the capacity to improve adherence to medication regimes and reduce the cost of treatment, stigmatization, and burden on healthcare providers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.