2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2015.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Portal Readiness (PPR) among the Underserved: Impact of PHIM Activities, Health Information Seeking, and Patient Attitudes towards Record Keeping

Abstract: Patient portals are increasingly becoming a solution for healthcare providers to provide patients with access to parts of their medical records such as lab results as well as to offer services such as customized educational materials, appointment scheduling, etc. However, the use of patient portals is still very low [1] especially among the underserved population. The objective of this study is to develop an understanding of the factors that may impact patient portal readiness among the underserved population.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies published in the past 5 years shows a lag in CHI adoption among the underserved when compared to the general public. Additionally, our results further show that a digital divide persists 50 51 52 53 . At the same time, increased mobile technology adoption by underserved populations has slowly changed the state and nature of the digital divide 9 54 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies published in the past 5 years shows a lag in CHI adoption among the underserved when compared to the general public. Additionally, our results further show that a digital divide persists 50 51 52 53 . At the same time, increased mobile technology adoption by underserved populations has slowly changed the state and nature of the digital divide 9 54 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For example, Pratt et al (2006), Civan et al (2006), and Ancker et al (2015) pointed to the importance of this field and mainly explored information collection and use activities. Other studies examined the information items (e.g., Whetstone, 2013), the volume of PHIM activities in relation to clinical information technologies (e.g., Nambisan, 2015), and the information technologies designed to support PHIM processes (e.g., Almalki, Gray, & Sanchez, 2015;Lucero et al, 2012;Piras & Zanutto, 2011). However, more research is necessary to establish a comprehensive model for PHIM and inquire the relationships between the diverse PHIM processes.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%