Patient Reported Outcome Assessment of Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review

Baeumer

Journal of Periodontology

et al. 2018

Background To assess oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) after long‐term (20 years) periodontal treatment in patients with chronic periodontitis (ChP) and to compare it with the current clinical outcome and oral health status. Methods Twenty years after therapy, 63 patients were reexamined. The dental and periodontal status and OHRQoL using the Oral Health Impact Profile‐G49 (OHIP‐G49) were assessed. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and tests for differences were calculated. Results Up to 75% of patients showed no probing depths > 5mm, bleeding on probing (BOP) ≤25%, no pain and satisfactory function. A comparatively low perceived oral impact of ChP was represented by an OHIP‐G49 overall score of 18.89 ± 21.66. The most common reported impairment was physical pain followed by “functional limitation.” A correlation between oral quality standard and the OHIP‐G49 was limited to the physical pain subdomain. Conclusions Satisfaction with oral status was perceived high by most patients treated for chronic periodontitis. A comparably high OHRQoL can be achieved and retained long‐term after periodontal treatment. The objective and subjective evaluation of oral health only correlated in the subscale “physical pain.”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Twenty years later: Oral health‐related quality of life and standard of treatment in patients with chronic periodontitis

Baeumer

Journal of Periodontology

et al. 2018

J of Periodontal Research

“…Three SRs investigated the effect of periodontal disease on OHRQoL 16‐18 . Three SRs evaluated the effect of periodontal therapy on OHRQoL 19‐21 . All SRs were published in English and between 2006 and 2020.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontal disease and quality of life: Umbrella review of systematic reviews

Wong

Yap

Allen

2020

This umbrella review appraised existing systematic reviews and meta‐analysis to establish the impact of periodontal disease and therapy on general and oral health‐related quality of life. A systematic electronic literature search was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA guideline up to January 2020 using PubMed, LIVIVO, EMBASE and OpenGrey (PROSPERO CRD 42020163831). Hand searching was performed through the reference lists of periodontal textbooks and related journals. All English language‐based systematic reviews and meta‐analysis that assessed the impact of periodontal disease and treatment interventions on general and oral health‐related quality of life were included. Overall, eight articles met the inclusion criteria and their methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR2 criteria. Two systematic reviews showed a significant impact of oral conditions on general health‐related quality of life, although the specific impact of periodontal disease remains inconclusive. Three systematic reviews established a negative impact of periodontal disease on oral health‐related quality of life. Another three systematic reviews concluded that periodontal treatment can improve oral health‐related quality of life. Oral conditions, like periodontal disease, can impact the general health‐related quality of life. Periodontal disease is negatively correlated with oral health‐related quality of life, although treatment interventions can improve self‐reported quality of life. In view of the heterogeneity of generic instruments currently utilized to assess the self‐reported quality of life of periodontal patients, the development of a general and oral health‐related quality of life instrument specific for periodontal disease is strongly recommended.

“…Patient-centered outcome assessment is now being considered as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials, as described in a recent systematic review [52]. In the extant literature on PROMS after PNST, the authors mostly use a visual analog scale (VAS) and questionnaires to evaluate patient's quality of life [53,54], level of anxiety, and/or the pain [54][55][56].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Respective Effects of Oral Hygiene Instructions and Periodontal Nonsurgical Treatment (Debridement) on Clinical Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with Respect to Smoking

Salhi

Albert

Seidel

2020

JCM

Background: Oral hygiene instructions (OHI) and periodontal nonsurgical treatment (PNST) play pivotal roles in the management of periodontitis. The study aims to discern their respective effects on periodontal clinical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: Ninety-one patients were included, 34 non-smokers (NS), 25 former smokers (FS) and 32 current smoker (CS). Clinical parameters such as probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were collected, and the periodontal inflamed tissue area (PISA) was calculated. Clinical parameters and PROMs were recorded before and after receiving OHI, with electronic tooth brush and interdental brushes, as well as 3 months after debridement. Results: Smokers presented a significantly higher proportion of severe periodontitis (64.7%) with generalized extension (76.5%) and with a rapid rate of progression (97.1%) compared to NS and FS. OHI led to a significant decrease of PD, BOP, and PISA (p < 0.0001) only in NS and FS. Debridement reduced PD and the percentage of PD >6 mm in all groups (p < 0.0001). OHI induced significant improvement of oral hygiene, frequency of interdental cleaning, and PROMs (p < 0.0001). Further debridement induced significant additional improvement PROMs in FS and NS (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: OHI and debridement improved periodontal clinical parameters and PROMs in both NS and FS. Former smokers had comparable outcomes to non-smokers, suggesting that smoking cessation should be encouraged.