2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07364-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcome during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the use of different PRO questionnaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-third of patients declined inclusion primarily because they could not oversee participation because they would find it too demanding. Our experience from other studies in this patient group is that around half of the patients will decline participation primarily because they are exhausted, overwhelmed by the treatment regimen, or a lack of personal resources [2,26]. A healthcare professional's incentive to ask a patient to participate can be affected by several causes, e.g., the individual healthcare professional's opinion on whether they find the patient suited for the project, their knowledge of new technologies, a busy work program, or competing protocols [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-third of patients declined inclusion primarily because they could not oversee participation because they would find it too demanding. Our experience from other studies in this patient group is that around half of the patients will decline participation primarily because they are exhausted, overwhelmed by the treatment regimen, or a lack of personal resources [2,26]. A healthcare professional's incentive to ask a patient to participate can be affected by several causes, e.g., the individual healthcare professional's opinion on whether they find the patient suited for the project, their knowledge of new technologies, a busy work program, or competing protocols [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FACT-H&N investigates the situation of patients seven days before the day of investigation, and the specific subscale include Physical Well-being (PWB), Social/Family Well-being (SWB), Emotional Well-being (EWB), Functional Well-being (FWB) and Head & Neck Cancer Subscale (HNCS), with a total of 39 items. The scores of the items contained in each domain were summed to obtain the crude score of this domain, and the scores of these five domains were summed to obtain the total score, which ranged from 0 to 148, where a higher overall score indicates a better corresponding quality of life (25,26).…”
Section: Instruments Fact-handnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient-reported content validity index scores were excellent, and weak bidirectional correlations were found with resilience, depression, and anxiety. Another study found that lower QoL scores at diagnosis and during the first year after diagnosis have a predictive value for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, independent of other factors, predicting lower overall survival [2,3], and another study examined the correlation between three commonly used instruments for assessing the quality of life of 33 head and neck cancer patients at Mato Grosso Cancer Hospital in Brazil, revealing a positive correlation [31,38,39]. None of the studies did predictive analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulty in mouth opening and swallowing, the majority of oral cancer patients only report when the condition is in advanced stages. They also exhibit anxiety about surviving a cancer diagnosis and receiving future treatment [2,3]. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-HN43) is a revised and updated version of the Head and Neck Cancer Module (QLQ-HN35) [4,5].…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%