2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported outcomes following lymph reconstructive surgery in lower limb lymphedema: A systematic review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This similar finding was also reported in a systemic review looking at QOL after lymphedema surgery for the lower limb. 2 Finally, when looking at the correlation based on the amount of limb volume reduction, there was no significant correlation between the improvement of the overall score and the amount of volume reduction. Although one can assume that satisfaction may be closely related to the amount of improvement, there was no significant correlation between improvement of limb volume after LVA and QOL in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This similar finding was also reported in a systemic review looking at QOL after lymphedema surgery for the lower limb. 2 Finally, when looking at the correlation based on the amount of limb volume reduction, there was no significant correlation between the improvement of the overall score and the amount of volume reduction. Although one can assume that satisfaction may be closely related to the amount of improvement, there was no significant correlation between improvement of limb volume after LVA and QOL in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 7 27 However, even with using these, most of the reports focused on the upper limb lymphedema and lacks studies focused on the lower extremity. 2 19 27 Thus, this PROM study was designed to include a large patient pool who underwent LVA to evaluate the QOL and to further provide meaningful insight through correlation analysis and subgroup analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously performed a thorough analysis according to the Consensusbased Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments of existing lymphedema-specific PROMs for patients with lower limb lymphedema (LLL) and identified the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema (LYMPH-ICF-LL) as superior in terms of its psychometric properties. 12,13 Based on a similar approach, Beelen et al claimed that none of the lymphedema-specific PROMs for patients with upper limb lymphedema (ULL) met methodological quality standards and thus, they developed the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module. [14][15][16] After translating the LYMPH-Q into German, we recently demonstrated that patients with arm lymphedema experience significant improvements of function, symptoms and psychological well-being after lymphatic reconstructive surgery, regardless of lymphedema grade, age, BMI, or comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%