2020
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Reported Outcomes Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage May Not Have Acceptable Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yoshida et al [9] found that the number of patients with a history of urinary stone disease was significantly lower in the SSP group. Finally, McLarty et al [21] reported that stone history did not differ between the SSP and non-SSP groups. According to our univariate analysis, presence of hydronephrosis and a previous urolithiasis history were significant parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yoshida et al [9] found that the number of patients with a history of urinary stone disease was significantly lower in the SSP group. Finally, McLarty et al [21] reported that stone history did not differ between the SSP and non-SSP groups. According to our univariate analysis, presence of hydronephrosis and a previous urolithiasis history were significant parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 2,158 conservatively managed patients reported the SSP rates as 83%, 70%, and 52% for the distal, middle, and proximal ureteral stones, respectively and 89%, 49%, and 29% for <5 mm, ≥5-7 mm, and >7 mm stones, respectively [20]. Recently, McLarty et al [21] showed that the patients in the SSP group had smaller (5.4 vs. 7.6 mm) and more distal (71.4% vs. 34.6%) ureteral stones. Our results were consistent with previous studies, indicating that stone size was significantly lower in the SSP group (5.2 vs 6.7 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient reported outcomes were used to predict spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi in this retrospective study of 212 patients by McLarty et al (page 524) from Canada. 3 Overall 49.5% successfully passed the stone, and stone size and distal ureteral location correlated with spontaneous passage. Of those with spontaneous passage 77% had cessation of pain compared to 44% without.…”
Section: Patient Reported Outcomes For Predicting Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passagementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Endpoint heterogeneity is a common obstacle in research evaluating MET as anything less than a study-end computed tomography appears to be inadequate. Studies in the adult literature have challenged the accuracy of patient selfreporting in assessing stone passage (21,22). More worrisome, secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective RCT investigating MET in adults reported over half of patients with a persistent ureteral stone showed resolution of hydronephrosis and reported no pain (23).…”
Section: Outcome-level Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%