Patient-Reported Roles in Decision-Making Among Asian Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicountry Study

Abstract

Purpose. We investigated 1) perceived roles in decision-making among advanced cancer patients in 5 Asian countries 2) associations of patient characteristics with these roles, and 3) the association of perceived roles with quality of life and perceived quality of care. Methods. We surveyed 1585 patients with stage IV solid cancer. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to analyze associations of patient characteristics with decision-making roles. Multivariate regressions were used to analyze associations of decision-making roles with quality of life and care. Results. The most common perceived-role was no patient involvement. Most patients (73%) reported roles consistent with their preferences. Being male, nonminority, higher educated, aware of advanced cancer diagnosis, and knowledge of cancer diagnosis for ≥1 year were associated with higher levels of patient involvement in decision-making. Compared to no patient involvement, joint decision-making (together with physicians/family) was associated with higher social (β = 2.49, P < 0.01) and spiritual (β = 2.64, P < 0.01) well-being, and better quality of physician communication (β = 9.73, P < 0.01) and care coordination (β = 13.96, P < 0.01) while making decisions alone was associated with lower emotional (β = −1.43, P < 0.01), social (β = −2.39, P < 0.01), and spiritual (β = −2.98, P < 0.01) well-being. Conclusions. Findings suggest that a substantial number of advanced cancer patients were not (and preferred not to be) involved in decision-making. Despite this finding, joint decision-making together with physicians/family was associated with better quality of life and care. Implications. Physicians should explain the benefits of shared decision making to patients and encourage participation in decision-making, while ensuring that patients feel supported and do not find decision-making overwhelming.

Variation in Patient-Reported Decision-Making Roles in the Last Year of Life among Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Longitudinal Study

“…Many factors can influence patient involvement in decision making, especially near EOL. Studies indicate that younger age, 2 higher education, 3 higher income, 3 and being nonminority 4 consistently predicted higher levels of involvement in decision making, while evidence on gender 5 and marital status 6 has been mixed. Cognitive difficulties could affect older individuals’ participation in decision making.…”

Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools

“…Various techniques have been designed to help patients obtain the information they need to enable them to play an active role in their care under a more equitable partnership. Although SDM has been increasingly popular in healthcare practice in Asia [6] and Taiwan [7], barriers may still be encountered [8], and the integration of digital and online processes on a hospital-wide implementation scale has scarcely been reported. Leaders in healthcare organizations are keen to run their service more efficiently and respond to patients' needs.…”

The Effect of a Nurse-Led Family Involvement Program on Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

“…These patients preferred to share decisions about cancer treatments with their family [30]. A previous study found that making decisions alone was linked to lower emotional, social, and spiritual wellbeing among Asian patients with advanced cancer, whereas making decisions jointly with doctors and family was linked to greater social and spiritual wellbeing [37]. Spending more time discussing treatment choices with family members helps patients cope with their cancer diagnosis and promotes cognitive processing, both of which may eventually reduce the patient's stress levels [38].…”