2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-reported treatment satisfaction with oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism; results from the EINSTEIN PE trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
78
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
78
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of rivaroxaban treatment was its cost. Most of our patients, like the subjects from the EINSTEIN-PE trial, appreciated the advantages of rivaroxaban therapy [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The main disadvantage of rivaroxaban treatment was its cost. Most of our patients, like the subjects from the EINSTEIN-PE trial, appreciated the advantages of rivaroxaban therapy [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to shorter hospital stay which translates to economic benefits of rivaroxaban therapy, higher patient satisfaction was also shown among patients treated with this drug compared to the standard therapy. In a group of 2397 participants of the EINSTEIN PE study, Prins et al [11] showed higher patient satisfaction in the rivaroxaban group compared to the VKA group. Importantly, reduced duration of hospitalisation is associated with lower treatment costs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Matsuo et al [10] evaluated the duration of hospital stay of 97 patients with VTE, including 78 patients treated with rivaroxaban and 19 patients treated with UFH followed by warfarin. These authors showed a significantly shorter duration of hospitalisation among patients treated with rivaroxaban (10 [6-15] vs. 15 [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] days, p = 0.016). In the Polish literature, no data have been previously available on the duration of hospitalisation among APE patients treated with NOAC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 In Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis (EINSTEIN-DVT; n = 1472), 13 patients randomized to rivaroxaban reported more favorable ACTS burden scores (55.2 vs 52.6; effect size 0.42; P < 0.0001) compared with enoxaparin/VKA. In the Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (EINSTEIN-PE) trial (n = 2397), 14 patients reported rivaroxaban as being less burdensome than enoxaparin/VKA (55.4 vs 51.9; P < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%