2013
DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient Safety Perspectives of Providers and Nurses: The Experience of a Rural Ambulatory Care Practice Using an EHR With E‐prescribing

Abstract: Concerns remain among providers and nurses regarding the use of EHR with eRx applications, although concerns differed between groups. Therefore, When EHR improvements are planned, it is important to consider the differing needs of the professionals who deliver care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They looked at general practice computer systems [ 68 ], the use of electronic health records and e-prescribing [ 69 ], patient identifiers and identification at a walk-in centre [ 70 , 71 ], uncertainties in providing healthcare [ 72 ], safety systems in commercial organisations providing NHS primary care [ 73 ] and the introduction of an incident reporting system [ 74 ]. The studies were based in the UK [ 68 , 70 , 71 , 73 ], The Netherlands [ 72 , 74 ] and the USA [ 69 ]. Following appraisal, all were considered ‘acceptable’ in terms of quality of reporting of research methods, except for one which was considered ‘excellent’ [ 68 ].…”
Section: Results: Study Characteristics Quality Of Methodological Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They looked at general practice computer systems [ 68 ], the use of electronic health records and e-prescribing [ 69 ], patient identifiers and identification at a walk-in centre [ 70 , 71 ], uncertainties in providing healthcare [ 72 ], safety systems in commercial organisations providing NHS primary care [ 73 ] and the introduction of an incident reporting system [ 74 ]. The studies were based in the UK [ 68 , 70 , 71 , 73 ], The Netherlands [ 72 , 74 ] and the USA [ 69 ]. Following appraisal, all were considered ‘acceptable’ in terms of quality of reporting of research methods, except for one which was considered ‘excellent’ [ 68 ].…”
Section: Results: Study Characteristics Quality Of Methodological Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies were ethnographic in nature, where the researchers carried out observations and interviews [ 70 74 ]. There was also an interview study with range of “key stakeholders” [ 68 ], and a focus groups study with healthcare providers [ 69 ]. No patients were interviewed in the studies in this subset.…”
Section: Results: Study Characteristics Quality Of Methodological Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature chosen (Table S1) included three literature reviews (Lapane, Quilliam, & Dore, ; Manchikanti, Whitfield, & Pallone, ; Odukoya & Chui, ), three systematic reviews (Clyne, Bradley, Hughes, Fahey, & Lapane, ; Gagnon, Nsangou, Payne‐Gagnon, Grenier, & Sicotte, ; Motulsky, Lamothe, & Sicotte, ), one review of federal regulation (Schneider & Schneider, ), four descriptive analyses (Gabriel et al., ; Hincapie et al., ; Joseph, Sow, Furukawa, Posnak, & Daniel, ; Westbrook et al., ), three surveys (Amirfar et al., ; Jariwala et al., ; Thomas et al., ), four qualitative interview studies (Abramson et al., ; Bergeron et al., ; Bramble et al., ; Grossman, Cross, Boukas, & Cohen, ), one cross‐sectional study (Cochran et al., ), one time‐motion study (Hollingworth et al., ), and two expert commentaries (Figge, Fox, & Tribble, ; Odukoya & Chui, ). Table S1 provides full details regarding the literature, including author, purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bramble et al () interviewed two focus groups: 4 prescribers/providers and 12 nurses. The main query was how the EHR with eRx impacted the care delivery system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation