Patient Satisfaction and Symptomatic Outcomes Following Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

Ragupathi, Madhu; Bhoot, Nilesh; Pickron, T. Bartley; Haas, Eric M.

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.045

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Morbidity associated with the STARR procedure has been reported to be up to 40% , and therefore our results, of 32%, are comparable with those in the literature. An overall complication rate of 36% was reported in the European STARR registry, in which over 2800 procedures have been recorded .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long‐term outcome

Adams

Papagrigoriadis

2013

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long‐term outcome

Adams

Papagrigoriadis

2013

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The complication rate was comparable to other studies using resection rectopexy [15, 17, 18] or the STARR method [33, 35] for IRI. Rectal perforation was caused by a heat-induced injury from use of ultracision necessitating closure and a temporary ostomy.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…Reduced rectal motility seemed to be a transient phenomenon since prevalence from short- to long-term followup was reduced from 16.7% to 5.6%. An alternative method used for obstructed defecation secondary to symptomatic IRI and rectocele is stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) [33]. The short-term outcome after median 6–20 months in these patients was comparable to our results.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Long-Term Outcome after Resection Rectopexy for Internal Rectal Intussusception

Johnson

Kjellevold

Johannessen

et al. 2012

ISRN Gastroenterology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims. The optimal treatment of patients with internal rectal intussusception (IRI) is unresolved. The aim was to study the short- and long-term outcome of resection rectopexy in these patients. Methods. An observational and mainly prospective study of 48 patients (44 women) with IRI who had ligament-preserving suture rectopexy by laparoscopic (n = 25) or open (n = 23) technique. Outcome measures were morbidity, scores for constipation and anal incontinence, patients' report, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results. From preoperatively to a median of 6 months and 76 months postoperatively, constipation scores were reduced from a mean of (95% CI) 13.20 (11.41 to 15.00) to 6.91 (5.29 to 8.54) and 6.35 (4.94 to 7.76) (P < 0.0001). The number of constipated patients was reduced from 35 to eleven and eight, respectively, and none became constipated. Nine of ten symptoms of constipation improved. Corresponding scores for anal incontinence were 4.7 (2.4–7.0), 4.0 (2.4–5.7), and 4.1 (2.3–5.8), respectively. HRQoL at long-term followup compared to the general Norwegian population was reduced in four out of eight dimensions concerning physical factors. The patient-reported outcome at short- and long-term followup was improved by 85.4% and 75.0%, respectively. Conclusions. Resection rectopexy for IRI improved the outcome. HRQoL was reduced compared with the general population.

show abstract

“…Fifteen studies have used the Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) (17, 18, 21, 28, 39-41, 43, 45, 46, 48-50, 53, 54). Altomare-score, Longo-score, and the obstructed defecation syndrome-score (ODS-score), or a self-reported or modified ODS-score (S-ODS or M-ODS) were also used in three (23,38,46) seven (39,40,43,46,47,52,53) and eight studies (24,26,30,37,42,49,50,51) respectively (Table 3). An overview of the instruments (scoring system) is presented in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relief of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome after Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR): a Meta-analysis

Stuto

et al. 2014

Acta Chirurgica Belgica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient Satisfaction and Symptomatic Outcomes Following Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

Cited by 17 publications

References 24 publications

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long‐term outcome

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defaecation syndrome: patients with previous pelvic floor surgery have poorer long‐term outcome

Long-Term Outcome after Resection Rectopexy for Internal Rectal Intussusception

Relief of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome after Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR): a Meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About