2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient satisfaction with outpatient neurology services: A momentum for improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven of the included papers (12.7%) used mixed methods for their studies [ 33 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 76 , 84 , 85 , 91 , 92 , 94 , 95 ]. Two of the quantitative studies (2.3%) reported specifically on using the Kaizen Lean methodology [ 59 , 78 ], which is based on the principles of process standardisation for quality improvement.…”
Section: Mapping the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eleven of the included papers (12.7%) used mixed methods for their studies [ 33 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 76 , 84 , 85 , 91 , 92 , 94 , 95 ]. Two of the quantitative studies (2.3%) reported specifically on using the Kaizen Lean methodology [ 59 , 78 ], which is based on the principles of process standardisation for quality improvement.…”
Section: Mapping the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the quantitative studies (2.3%) reported specifically on using the Kaizen Lean methodology [ 59 , 78 ], which is based on the principles of process standardisation for quality improvement. Six studies (6.9%) examined various factors influencing patient satisfaction [ 35 , 38 , 79 , 82 , 89 , 93 ] and five other studies (5.8%) explored predictors of patient satisfaction [ 20 , 91 ] and/or correlations with other outcomes [ 26 , 44 , 58 ] (e.g., adverse events). We also included one clinical trial protocol in this review [ 49 ], as it outlined a prospective study that specifically examined the use of collected PROM data, as well as barriers and facilitators related to the data and preferred methods of feedback from both patients and physicians.…”
Section: Mapping the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSQ‐18 scale is one of the most authoritative scales in satisfaction research. Its reliability and validity test results were reliable, and it has been widely used in satisfaction research in the health field 7,8 . The Chinese version of the PSQ‐18 scale was used to evaluate parents' satisfaction in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Its reliability and validity test results were reliable, and it has been widely used in satisfaction research in the health field. 7,8 The Chinese version of the PSQ-18 scale was used to evaluate parents' satisfaction in this study. The scale contained seven dimensions and a total of 18 questions.…”
Section: Observation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predisposing factors exist before presentation with a health condition, i.e., socio-demographic or socio-cultural characteristics; enabling factors represent the logistical means for accessing health services; and need factors are the effectual cause of health service use and reflect the perceived health status of the health care user [ 10 , 11 ]. The outcome measure for this study, patient satisfaction, is widely accepted as an assessment of overall healthcare quality [ 12 , 13 ]. Patient satisfaction is associated with health-related quality of life (an individual’s or a group’s perceived physical and mental health over time) [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%