2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1419-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-Specific Biomechanical Modeling for Guidance During Minimally-Invasive Hepatic Surgery

Abstract: During the minimally-invasive liver surgery, only the partial surface view of the liver is usually provided to the surgeon via the laparoscopic camera. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the actual position of the internal structures such as tumors and vessels from the pre-operative images. Nevertheless, such task can be highly challenging since during the intervention, the abdominal organs undergo important deformations due to the pneumoperitoneum, respiratory and cardiac motion and the interaction with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This registration aligned the phantom and clinical data according to the salient features, but differences in organ size and extent remained. We should also note that others are also following this approach [25]. Following initial rigid alignment, the finite iterative closest point registration method by Kroon [26] incorporated scale and skew into the optimization of a transformation matrix, providing an affine registration which accounts for differences in data extent and organ size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This registration aligned the phantom and clinical data according to the salient features, but differences in organ size and extent remained. We should also note that others are also following this approach [25]. Following initial rigid alignment, the finite iterative closest point registration method by Kroon [26] incorporated scale and skew into the optimization of a transformation matrix, providing an affine registration which accounts for differences in data extent and organ size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomechanical finite element (FE) model of liver [14] used makes the assumption of linear stress-strain relation, it employs a co-rotational formulation of the strain to handle large nonlinear displacements. The model reconstructed from patient-specific anatomy is reliable for physics-based augmented reality [15]. The proposed matching method is not limited to the chosen FE model which can be replaced by another elastic model, including non-linear ones [16].…”
Section: Fast Biomechanical Liver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dirichlet conditions are imposed via penalty method: physically, this method can be interpreted as adding a set of elastic linear springs which pull each node n i from its initial position x A i to the target position x B j . Similarly, the deformation is computed as a dynamic process given by the system Mü + Bu + K(u) = p where M is a mass matrix, K is the nonlinear co-rotational stiffness with contributions from elastic springs, B is a damping matrix approximated using Rayleigh stiffness r K and Rayleigh mass r M as B = r M M + r K K and p is a vector gathering the prescribed displacements given by the actual matching pairs [15]. The system is integrated by implicit Euler method with single linearization per integration step with r K = r M = 0.1.…”
Section: Fast Biomechanical Liver Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this problem, Plantefève et al 6 used anatomical landmarks to achieve a stable initial registration. The preoperative landmarks were labeled automatically while the intraoperative labeling required manual interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%