2016
DOI: 10.1515/cdbme-2016-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient specific root-analogue dental implants – additive manufacturing and finite element analysis

Abstract: Aim of this study was to prove the possibility of manufacturing patient specific root analogue twopart (implant and abutment) implants by direct metal laser sintering. The two-part implant design enables covered healing of the implant. Therefore, CT-scans of three patients are used for reverse engineering of the implants, abutments and crowns. Patient specific implants are manufactured and measured concerning dimensional accuracy and surface roughness. Impacts of occlusal forces are simulated via FEA and compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in displacements along the loading direction (Z-axis) between the RAIs and the TIs, suggesting comparable stability between the two implant types. These findings are consistent with a study by Gattinger et al [ 38 ], where they compared by finite element analysis the micromotion of RAI and standard implant and reported that the RAI was as good as the standard threaded implant in terms of micromotion. A similar conclusion was reached out by Chen et al [ 39 ] who studied the biomechanical performance of RAI for both the immediate and the delayed loading protocols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of this study revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in displacements along the loading direction (Z-axis) between the RAIs and the TIs, suggesting comparable stability between the two implant types. These findings are consistent with a study by Gattinger et al [ 38 ], where they compared by finite element analysis the micromotion of RAI and standard implant and reported that the RAI was as good as the standard threaded implant in terms of micromotion. A similar conclusion was reached out by Chen et al [ 39 ] who studied the biomechanical performance of RAI for both the immediate and the delayed loading protocols.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Clearly, teeth are an important part of human body playing an important role in our digestive systems by grinding the food to swallowable size [1,2]. Approximately half of the population experience tooth loss at some stage in life due to various factors, excluding the natural loss due to age [3][4][5][6][7]. The loss of teeth due to unnatural causes is often treated with artificial teeth which have life expectancy of 65-95% [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis (FEA) has become an effective method to evaluate peri-implant bone stresses and the relative micro-displacement between bone-to-implant interfaces under certain loading conditions [21]. However, most previous FEA studies on RAIs were limited in the analysis of the initial stability, which is one of the most important factors for the success of implant placement; they assumed the contact condition between the bone and implant was fully bonded and in a completely osseo-integrated state [19,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%