2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient specific total temporomandibular joint reconstruction: A review of biomaterial, designs, fabrication and outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Growing developments in synthetic biomaterials show promise for replacing autografts in oral-maxillofacial bone tissue reconstruction applications [ 1 , 4 , 5 ]. With the evolution of personalized medicine, synthetic biomaterials have been increasingly used in the reconstruction of oral-maxillofacial bone defects through the advanced applications of cone-beam computed tomography combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing technology [ 6 , 7 ]. Biomaterials customized by 3D printing technology for oral-maxillofacial bone defects could also save more time during surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing developments in synthetic biomaterials show promise for replacing autografts in oral-maxillofacial bone tissue reconstruction applications [ 1 , 4 , 5 ]. With the evolution of personalized medicine, synthetic biomaterials have been increasingly used in the reconstruction of oral-maxillofacial bone defects through the advanced applications of cone-beam computed tomography combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing technology [ 6 , 7 ]. Biomaterials customized by 3D printing technology for oral-maxillofacial bone defects could also save more time during surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the use of wear-resistant materials (material combinations) such as UHMWPE for the fossa and cobalt–chromium–molybdenum or titanium alloy forming the condyle component, most of these disadvantages have been significantly reduced. The osteosynthesis screws used are made of titanium alloy by all well-known manufacturers [ 5 ]. And although current guidelines of European professional societies mention the risks of screw loosening and fracture, especially in the case of strong muscular hyperactivity [ 6 ], these events are extremely rare to not described at all in the literature for patient-specific/custom-made prostheses/implants [ 1 , 5 , 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The osteosynthesis screws used are made of titanium alloy by all well-known manufacturers [ 5 ]. And although current guidelines of European professional societies mention the risks of screw loosening and fracture, especially in the case of strong muscular hyperactivity [ 6 ], these events are extremely rare to not described at all in the literature for patient-specific/custom-made prostheses/implants [ 1 , 5 , 7 ]. PSI-TJRs are believed to allow less micromovement at the implant–bone interface due to their higher fitting accuracy based on high-resolution imaging techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura ha reportado grandes ventajas como reducción del tiempo operatorio, la visualización de componentes neurovasculares, lo que reduce el riesgo de su daño, y resultados altamente predecibles con estabilidad esquelética y oclusal 7 . Sus desventajas se asocian a problemas de longevidad debido al desgaste o falla del material, hipersensibilidad del material y alto costo 8 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified